» Articles » PMID: 24149848

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Serosa-positive Gastric Cancer (pT4a) in Patients with Preoperative Diagnosis of Cancer Without Serosal Invasion

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 Oct 24
PMID 24149848
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although surgeons normally use minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients with early gastric cancer, in Korea and Japan the procedure is also indicated for serosa-negative tumors. Serosal invasion is regarded to be a potential risk factor for peritoneal dissemination as a result of the effect of pneumoperitoneum and tumor manipulation during the operation. We compared operative outcomes between MIS and conventional open surgery for serosa-involved advanced gastric cancer patients who had a preoperative diagnosis of cancer without serosal invasion.

Methods: A total of 61 patients (39 patients treated by MIS and 22 by open surgery) treated between 2003 and 2009 who were first diagnosed preoperatively as serosa negative on the basis of computed tomography, endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound but then diagnosed as serosa positive upon final pathology were studied. We retrospectively compared recurrence and survival between the two treatment groups.

Results: Clinicopathologic characteristics, clinical stage, extent of surgery, and short-term operative outcome did not differ between the groups. 5-year overall survival (73.5 vs. 67.5 %, p = 0.518, respectively) and disease-free survival (67.8 vs. 54.2 %, p = 0.296, respectively) were comparable between the MIS and open surgery groups. There were recurrences in 12 patients in the MIS group and 11 patients in the open surgery group, with a median follow-up period of 64 months. Recurrence patterns did not differ between the groups; moreover, MIS did not increase peritoneal recurrences compared to open surgery (42.0 vs. 54.5 %, p = 0.537, respectively). In multivariate analyses, the type of surgery was not an independent prognostic factor.

Conclusions: Similar survival and recurrence patterns were observed in advanced gastric cancer patients preoperatively diagnosed as serosa negative who were treated either by MIS or open surgery. MIS may be safely applied in patients with serosa-positive tumors.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Role of Robotic Surgery Gastric Cancer Treatment: A Comprehensive Review by the Robotic Global Surgical Society (TROGSS) and European Federation International Society for Digestive Surgery (EFISDS) Joint Working Group.

Marano L, Cwalinski T, Girnyi S, Skokowski J, Goyal A, Malerba S Curr Oncol. 2025; 32(2).

PMID: 39996883 PMC: 11854667. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32020083.


Oncological long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for cT3-4 gastric cancer at surgical staging: a propensity-score matched cohort study.

Manuel A, Kinoshita T, Amini N, Akimoto E, Yura M, Yoshida M Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(11):6682-6690.

PMID: 39317910 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11287-8.


Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for T4a gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of long-term outcomes.

Long V, Nguyen D, Thong D, Dat T, Hai N, Vuong N Updates Surg. 2024; 76(5):1843-1854.

PMID: 38879836 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01910-7.


Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for nonmetastatic T4a gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of reconstructed individual participant data from propensity score-matched studies.

Pang H, Yan M, Zhao Z, Chen L, Chen X, Chen Z World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):143.

PMID: 38812025 PMC: 11134691. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03422-5.


Gastric Cancer Surgery: Balancing Oncological Efficacy against Postoperative Morbidity and Function Detriment.

Tsekrekos A, Okumura Y, Rouvelas I, Nilsson M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 38730693 PMC: 11083646. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091741.


References
1.
Lee J, Kim W . Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: analysis of consecutive 106 experiences. J Surg Oncol. 2009; 100(8):693-8. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21400. View

2.
Huscher C, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M, Recher A . Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg. 2005; 241(2):232-7. PMC: 1356907. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000151892.35922.f2. View

3.
Sakuramoto S, Kikuchi S, KUROYAMA S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Kobayashi N . Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: experience with 111 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc. 2005; 20(1):55-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0126-5. View

4.
Hasegawa S, Kunisaki C, Ono H, Oshima T, Fujii S, Taguri M . Omentum-preserving gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study. Gastric Cancer. 2012; 16(3):383-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-012-0198-6. View

5.
Kim M, Kim K, Kim H, Jung G . Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2005; 91(1):90-4. DOI: 10.1002/jso.20271. View