» Articles » PMID: 24143258

Environmental Conditions During Breeding Modify the Strength of Mass-dependent Carry-over Effects in a Migratory Bird

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Oct 22
PMID 24143258
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In many animals, processes occurring in one season carry over to influence reproductive success and survival in future seasons. The strength of such carry-over effects is unlikely to be uniform across years, yet our understanding of the processes that are capable of modifying their strength remains limited. Here we show that female light-bellied Brent geese with higher body mass prior to spring migration successfully reared more offspring during breeding, but only in years where environmental conditions during breeding were favourable. In years of bad weather during breeding, all birds suffered reduced reproductive output irrespective of pre-migration mass. Our results suggest that the magnitude of reproductive benefits gained by maximising body stores to fuel breeding fluctuates markedly among years in concert with conditions during the breeding season, as does the degree to which carry-over effects are capable of driving variance in reproductive success among individuals. Therefore while carry-over effects have considerable power to drive fitness asymmetries among individuals, our ability to interpret these effects in terms of their implications for population dynamics is dependent on knowledge of fitness determinants occurring in subsequent seasons. 

Citing Articles

Individual variability in the phenology of an asynchronous penguin species induces consequences on breeding and carry-over effects.

Joly N, Chiaradia A, Georges J, Saraux C Oecologia. 2025; 207(1):16.

PMID: 39754672 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-024-05644-6.


The influence of diet on gut microbiome and body mass dynamics in a capital-breeding migratory bird.

Jones I, Marsh K, Handby T, Hopkins K, Slezacek J, Bearhop S PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16682.

PMID: 38130921 PMC: 10734429. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16682.


Time-varying effects of local weather on behavior and probability of breeding deferral in two Arctic-nesting goose populations.

Cunningham S, Schafer T, Wikle C, VonBank J, Ballard B, Cao L Oecologia. 2022; 201(2):369-383.

PMID: 36576527 PMC: 9944342. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05300-x.


Variation in movement strategies: Capital versus income migration.

Evans S, Bearhop S J Anim Ecol. 2022; 91(10):1961-1974.

PMID: 35962601 PMC: 9825870. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13800.


Effects of pair migratory behavior on breeding phenology and success in a partially migratory shorebird population.

Mendez V, Alves J, Gill J, Borisson B, Carneiro C, Palsdottir A Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(8):e9184.

PMID: 35949536 PMC: 9353121. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9184.


References
1.
Wilson A, Reale D, Clements M, Morrissey M, Postma E, Walling C . An ecologist's guide to the animal model. J Anim Ecol. 2010; 79(1):13-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01639.x. View

2.
Harrison X, Blount J, Inger R, Norris D, Bearhop S . Carry-over effects as drivers of fitness differences in animals. J Anim Ecol. 2010; 80(1):4-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01740.x. View

3.
Gill J, Norris K, Potts P, Gunnarsson T, Atkinson P, Sutherland W . The buffer effect and large-scale population regulation in migratory birds. Nature. 2001; 412(6845):436-8. DOI: 10.1038/35086568. View

4.
Inger R, Harrison X, Ruxton G, Newton J, Colhoun K, Gudmundsson G . Carry-over effects reveal reproductive costs in a long-distance migrant. J Anim Ecol. 2010; 79(5):974-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01712.x. View

5.
Witter M, Cuthill I . The ecological costs of avian fat storage. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1993; 340(1291):73-92. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1993.0050. View