» Articles » PMID: 24141896

Is There a Role for Routine Screening MRI in Women with LCIS?

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 Oct 22
PMID 24141896
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Women with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) have an elevated breast cancer risk, yet the benefit of MRI screening is unclear. We examined cancer detection rates with mammography alone versus mammography plus MRI in this high-risk population. From a prospectively maintained, single-institution database, we identified 776 patients diagnosed with LCIS after the adoption of screening MRI in April 1999. In addition to annual mammography and breast exam, MRI was used at the discretion of the physician and patient. Kaplan-Meier methods and landmark analyses at 1, 2, and 3 years following LCIS diagnosis were performed to compare rates of cancer detection with or without MRI. MRI screening was performed in 455 (59 %) patients (median, 3/patient). Median time from LCIS diagnosis to first MRI was 9 months (range 0.3-137 months). Patients undergoing MRI were younger (p < 0.0001), premenopausal (p < 0.0001), and more likely to have ≥1 first-degree relative with breast cancer (p = 0.009). At a median follow-up of 58 months, 98/776 (13 %) patients developed cancer. The crude cancer detection rate in both screening groups was 13 %. MRI was not associated with earlier stage, smaller size, or node negativity. Landmark analyses at 1, 2, and 3 years after LCIS diagnosis failed to demonstrate increased cancer detection rates among women having MRI (p = 0.23, 0.26, and 0.13, respectively). Although a diagnosis of LCIS remains a significant risk factor for breast cancer, the routine use of MRI does not result in increased cancer detection rates (short-term), nor does it result in earlier stage at diagnosis, illustrating the importance of defining optimal screening strategies for high-risk patients based on tumor biology rather than numerical risk.

Citing Articles

Guidelines for breast cancer management in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Hadzikadic-Gusic L, Ceric T, Marijanovic I, Iljazovic E, Kopric D, Zorlak A Biomol Biomed. 2022; 23(1):2-14.

PMID: 35880400 PMC: 9901905. DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2022.7504.


Screening MRI in Women at Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk: An Update of the Recent Literature.

Bahl M J Breast Imaging. 2022; 4(3):231-240.

PMID: 35783682 PMC: 9233194. DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac021.


Synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer among women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ.

Mallory M, Whiting K, Park A, Gonen M, Gilbert E, King T Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 194(1):137-148.

PMID: 35488092 PMC: 11325477. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06532-4.


Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography Screening for Intermediate-Risk Women With a History of Lobular Neoplasia.

Hogan M, Amir T, Sevilimedu V, Sung J, Morris E, Jochelson M AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021; 216(6):1486-1491.

PMID: 33787291 PMC: 9219005. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.23480.


The Tyrer-Cuzick Model Inaccurately Predicts Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in Women With LCIS.

Valero M, Zabor E, Park A, Gilbert E, Newman A, King T Ann Surg Oncol. 2019; 27(3):736-740.

PMID: 31559544 PMC: 7500748. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07814-w.


References
1.
Leach M, Boggis C, Dixon A, Easton D, Eeles R, Evans D . Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet. 2005; 365(9473):1769-78. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66481-1. View

2.
Sung J, Malak S, Bajaj P, Alis R, Dershaw D, Morris E . Screening breast MR imaging in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ. Radiology. 2011; 261(2):414-20. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110091. View

3.
Heijnsdijk E, Warner E, Gilbert F, Tilanus-Linthorst M, Evans G, Causer P . Differences in natural history between breast cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and effects of MRI screening-MRISC, MARIBS, and Canadian studies combined. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012; 21(9):1458-68. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1196. View

4.
Lehman C, Blume J, Weatherall P, Thickman D, Hylton N, Warner E . Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005; 103(9):1898-905. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20971. View

5.
Gao X, Fisher S, Emami B . Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003; 56(4):1038-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00203-7. View