Accuracy of Dual-energy Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Iodine Concentration Using Cardiac CT Protocols: Validation in a Phantom Model
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To assess the accuracy of dual-energy CT (DECT) for the quantification of iodine concentrations in a thoracic phantom across various cardiac DECT protocols and simulated patient sizes.
Materials And Methods: Experiments were performed on first- and second-generation dual-source CT (DSCT) systems in DECT mode using various cardiac DECT protocols. An anthropomorphic thoracic phantom was equipped with tubular inserts containing known iodine concentrations (0-20 mg/mL) in the cardiac chamber and up to two fat-equivalent rings to simulate different patient sizes. DECT-derived iodine concentrations were measured using dedicated software and compared to true concentrations. General linear regression models were used to identify predictors of measurement accuracy
Results: Correlation between measured and true iodine concentrations (n = 72) across CT systems and protocols was excellent (R = 0.994-0.997, P < 0.0001). Mean measurement errors were 3.0 ± 7.0% and -2.9 ± 3.8% for first- and second-generation DSCT, respectively. This error increased with simulated patient size. The second-generation DSCT showed the most stable measurements across a wide range of iodine concentrations and simulated patient sizes.
Conclusion: Overall, DECT provides accurate measurements of iodine concentrations across cardiac CT protocols, strengthening the case for DECT-derived blood volume estimates as a surrogate of myocardial blood supply.
Key Points: • Dual-energy CT provides new opportunities for quantitative assessment in cardiac imaging. • DECT can quantify myocardial iodine as a surrogate for myocardial perfusion. • DECT measurements of iodine concentrations are overall very accurate. • The accuracy of such measurements decreases as patient size increases.
Dual-energy Computed Tomography in Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring.
Abhijith S, Jaseemudheen M Heart Views. 2024; 25(2):74-79.
PMID: 39619105 PMC: 11604197. DOI: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_24_24.
Yel I, Booz C, DAngelo T, Koch V, Gruenewald L, Eichler K Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(18).
PMID: 39335730 PMC: 11431114. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14182051.
Meloni A, Maffei E, Clemente A, De Gori C, Occhipinti M, Positano V J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).
PMID: 38673632 PMC: 11051476. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082359.
Vrbaski S, Bache S, Rajagopal J, Samei E Med Phys. 2023; 50(9):5421-5433.
PMID: 37415402 PMC: 10897956. DOI: 10.1002/mp.16583.
Geng D, Zhou Y, Su G, Si Y, Shen M, Xu X BMC Med Imaging. 2023; 23(1):25.
PMID: 36740672 PMC: 9901076. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-00983-x.