» Articles » PMID: 24141036

Denosumab Compared with Risedronate in Postmenopausal Women Suboptimally Adherent to Alendronate Therapy: Efficacy and Safety Results from a Randomized Open-label Study

Overview
Journal Bone
Date 2013 Oct 22
PMID 24141036
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Denosumab has been shown to reduce new vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In subjects who were treatment-naïve or previously treated with alendronate, denosumab was associated with greater gains in bone mineral density (BMD) and decreases in bone turnover markers when compared with alendronate-treated subjects. This trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab with risedronate over 12 months in postmenopausal women who transitioned from daily or weekly alendronate treatment and were considered to be suboptimally adherent to therapy. In this randomized, open-label study, postmenopausal women aged ≥55 years received denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months or risedronate 150 mg orally every month for 12 months. Endpoints included percentage change from baseline in total hip BMD (primary endpoint), femoral neck, and lumbar spine BMD at month 12, and percentage change from baseline in sCTX-1 at months 1 and 6. Safety was also assessed. A total of 870 subjects were randomized (435, risedronate; 435, denosumab) who had a mean (SD) age of 67.7 (6.9) years, mean (SD) BMD T-scores of -1.6 (0.9), -1.9 (0.7), and -2.2 (1.2) at the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine, respectively, and median sCTX-1 of 0.3 ng/mL at baseline. At month 12, denosumab significantly increased BMD compared with risedronate at the total hip (2.0% vs 0.5%), femoral neck (1.4% vs 0%), and lumbar spine (3.4% vs 1.1%; p<0.0001 at all sites). Denosumab significantly decreased sCTX-1 compared with risedronate at month 1 (median change from baseline of -78% vs -17%; p<0.0001) and month 6 (-61% vs -23%; p<0.0001). Overall and serious adverse events were similar between groups. In postmenopausal women who were suboptimally adherent to alendronate therapy, transitioning to denosumab was well tolerated and more effective than risedronate in increasing BMD and reducing bone turnover.

Citing Articles

Sequential treatment from bisphosphonate to denosumab improves lumbar spine bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Jiang X, Hou S, Deng X, Hu L, Wang J, Hou D Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(46):e40594.

PMID: 39560527 PMC: 11576034. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040594.


Efficacy and safety of denosumab and teriparatide versus oral bisphosphonates to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yang J, Guo X, Cui Z, Guo H, Dong J Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1431676.

PMID: 39286276 PMC: 11402677. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1431676.


Denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of comparative safety in randomized controlled trials.

Kobayashi T, Morimoto T, Ito K, Mawatari M, Shimazaki T Osteoporos Int. 2024; 35(8):1377-1393.

PMID: 38733394 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07118-0.


Risk factors for nonresponse to 2 years of denosumab administration in patients with osteoporosis: A retrospective single-center cohorts study.

Yamamoto A, Nagao M, Nishizaki Y, Maeda E, Ishijima M Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(4):e1993.

PMID: 38585014 PMC: 10995440. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1993.


Zinc improves Denosumab and eldecalcitol efficacy for bone mineral density in patients with hypozincemia.

Ishizu H, Shimizu T, Ohashi Y, Kusunoki K, Kanayama M, Iwasaki N J Bone Miner Metab. 2024; 42(2):233-241.

PMID: 38324176 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-024-01498-3.