» Articles » PMID: 24138747

Evaluation of the National Roll-out of Parenting Programmes Across England: the Parenting Early Intervention Programme (PEIP)

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2013 Oct 22
PMID 24138747
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Evidence based parenting programmes can improve parenting skills and the behaviour of children exhibiting, or at risk of developing, antisocial behaviour. In order to develop a public policy for delivering these programmes it is necessary not only to demonstrate their efficacy through rigorous trials but also to determine that they can be rolled out on a large scale. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the UK government funded national implementation of its Parenting Early Intervention Programme, a national roll-out of parenting programmes for parents of children 8-13 years in all 152 local authorities (LAs) across England. Building upon our study of the Pathfinder (2006-08) implemented in 18 LAs. To the best of our knowledge this is the first comparative study of a national roll-out of parenting programmes and the first study of parents of children 8-13 years.

Methods: The UK government funded English LAs to implement one or more of five evidence based programmes (later increased to eight): Triple P, Incredible Years, Strengthening Families Strengthening Communities, Families and Schools Together (FAST), and the Strengthening Families Programme (10-14). Parents completed measures of parenting style (laxness and over-reactivity), and mental well-being, and also child behaviour at three time points: pre- and post-course and again one year later.

Results: 6143 parents from 43 LAs were included in the study of whom 3325 provided post-test data and 1035 parents provided data at one-year follow up. There were significant improvements for each programme, with effect sizes (Cohen's d) for the combined sample of 0.72 parenting laxness, 0.85 parenting over-reactivity, 0.79 parent mental well-being, and 0.45 for child conduct problems. These improvements were largely maintained one year later. All four programmes for which we had sufficient data for comparison were effective. There were generally larger effects on both parent and child measures for Triple P, but not all between programme comparisons were significant. Results for the targeted group of parents of children 8-13 years were very similar.

Conclusions: Evidence-based parenting programmes can be rolled out effectively in community settings on a national scale. This study also demonstrates the impact of research on shaping government policy.

Citing Articles

Predictors of Access to Early Support in Families of Children with Suspected or Diagnosed Developmental Disabilities in the United Kingdom.

Sapiets S, Hastings R, Totsika V J Autism Dev Disord. 2023; 54(4):1628-1641.

PMID: 37142908 PMC: 10159231. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-023-05996-7.


Baby and us: Community-based, Feasibility Trial of a Psychosocial Intervention for New Parents and their Infants.

Harwood J, Fernandez L, Vallejo V, Day C J Prev (2022). 2022; 43(5):589-604.

PMID: 35902491 PMC: 9482590. DOI: 10.1007/s10935-022-00685-0.


Impact of a peer-led, community-based parenting programme delivered at a national scale: an uncontrolled cohort design with benchmarking.

Day C, Harwood J, Kendall N, Nicoll J BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):1377.

PMID: 35850876 PMC: 9295349. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13691-y.


The cost-effectiveness of a proportionate parenting programme for primary caregivers and their child: an economic evaluation using evidence from the E-SEE Trial.

Cox E, Walker S, Blower S, Sampaio F, Bywater T, Richardson G BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):814.

PMID: 35739551 PMC: 9219217. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08220-x.


Evaluating the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the 'strengthening families, strengthening communities' group-based parenting programme: study protocol and initial insights.

Lodder A, Mehay A, Pavlickova H, Hoare Z, Box L, Butt J BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):1887.

PMID: 34666724 PMC: 8524224. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11912-4.


References
1.
Biglan A, Flay B, Embry D, Sandler I . The critical role of nurturing environments for promoting human well-being. Am Psychol. 2012; 67(4):257-71. PMC: 3621015. DOI: 10.1037/a0026796. View

2.
LaRocca R, Yost J, Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Butt M . The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:751. PMC: 3532315. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-751. View

3.
Dretzke J, Davenport C, Frew E, Barlow J, Stewart-Brown S, Bayliss S . The clinical effectiveness of different parenting programmes for children with conduct problems: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2009; 3(1):7. PMC: 2660289. DOI: 10.1186/1753-2000-3-7. View

4.
Stewart-Brown S, Schrader-McMillan A . Parenting for mental health: what does the evidence say we need to do? Report of Workpackage 2 of the DataPrev project. Health Promot Int. 2011; 26 Suppl 1:i10-28. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dar056. View

5.
Barlow J, Coren E . Parent-training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; (4):CD002020. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020. View