» Articles » PMID: 24131165

Clinician Beliefs and Attitudes About Buprenorphine/naloxone Diversion

Overview
Journal Am J Addict
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2013 Oct 18
PMID 24131165
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Concern about diversion of buprenorphine/naloxone (B/N) in the United States may affect prescribing patterns and policy decisions. This study examines addiction treatment clinician beliefs and attitudes regarding B/N diversion.

Methods: Participants (n = 369) completed a 34-item survey in 2010 during two national symposia on opioid dependence. We conducted multivariable regression, examining the relationship of perceived danger from B/N diversion with clinician characteristics and their beliefs about B/N treatment and diversion. We compared causal beliefs about diversion among clinicians with and without B/N treatment experience.

Results: Forty percent of clinicians believed that B/N diversion is a dangerous problem. The belief that B/N diversion increases accidental overdoses in the community was strongly associated with perceived danger from B/N diversion.

Conclusions And Scientific Significance: Attitudes and beliefs, not education level, were associated with clinician's perceived danger from B/N diversion. Clinicians with greater B/N patient experience were more likely to believe treatment access barriers are the major cause of B/N diversion.

Citing Articles

Evidence on Buprenorphine Dose Limits: A Review.

Grande L, Cundiff D, Greenwald M, Murray M, Wright T, Martin S J Addict Med. 2023; 17(5):509-516.

PMID: 37788601 PMC: 10547105. DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001189.


Patients' perceptions of self-administered dosing to opioid agonist treatment and other changes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

Scott G, Turner S, Lowry N, Hodge A, Ashraf W, McClean K BMJ Open. 2023; 13(3):e069857.

PMID: 36944465 PMC: 10032386. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069857.


Assessing the feasibility, usability and acceptability of the platform among individuals in outpatient buprenorphine treatment: Lessons learned from a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Janzow G, Harding C, Flores M, Borodovsky J, Steinkamp J, Marsch L Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2023; 3:100045.

PMID: 36845988 PMC: 9949338. DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100045.


Association between Prescribers' Perceptions of the Utilization of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder and Opioid Dependence Treatability.

Adzrago D, Di Paola A, Zhu J, Betancur A, Wilkerson J Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(9).

PMID: 36141345 PMC: 9498711. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10091733.


The relationship between patients' income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review.

Atkins N, Mukhida K Can J Pain. 2022; 6(1):142-170.

PMID: 36092247 PMC: 9450907. DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2104699.


References
1.
Dasgupta N, Bailey E, Cicero T, Inciardi J, Parrino M, Rosenblum A . Post-marketing surveillance of methadone and buprenorphine in the United States. Pain Med. 2010; 11(7):1078-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00877.x. View

2.
Bailey J, Campagna E, Dart R . The underrecognized toll of prescription opioid abuse on young children. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 53(4):419-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.015. View

3.
Schepis T, Krishnan-Sarin S . Sources of prescriptions for misuse by adolescents: differences in sex, ethnicity, and severity of misuse in a population-based study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009; 48(8):828-836. PMC: 3695610. DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181a8130d. View

4.
Rieckmann T, Daley M, Fuller B, Thomas C, McCarty D . Client and counselor attitudes toward the use of medications for treatment of opioid dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007; 32(2):207-15. PMC: 2847884. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.09.002. View

5.
Geib A, Babu K, Ewald M, Boyer E . Adverse effects in children after unintentional buprenorphine exposure. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(4):1746-51. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-0948. View