» Articles » PMID: 24129256

A Distinguishable Role of EDNA in the Viscoelastic Relaxation of Biofilms

Overview
Journal mBio
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2013 Oct 17
PMID 24129256
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Bacteria in the biofilm mode of growth are protected against chemical and mechanical stresses. Biofilms are composed, for the most part, of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs). The extracellular matrix is composed of different chemical constituents, such as proteins, polysaccharides, and extracellular DNA (eDNA). Here we aimed to identify the roles of different matrix constituents in the viscoelastic response of biofilms. Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus mutans, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms were grown under different conditions yielding distinct matrix chemistries. Next, biofilms were subjected to mechanical deformation and stress relaxation was monitored over time. A Maxwell model possessing an average of four elements for an individual biofilm was used to fit the data. Maxwell elements were defined by a relaxation time constant and their relative importance. Relaxation time constants varied widely over the 104 biofilms included and were divided into seven ranges (<1, 1 to 5, 5 to 10, 10 to 50, 50 to 100, 100 to 500, and >500 s). Principal-component analysis was carried out to eliminate related time constant ranges, yielding three principal components that could be related to the known matrix chemistries. The fastest relaxation component (<3 s) was due to the presence of water and soluble polysaccharides, combined with the absence of bacteria, i.e., the heaviest masses in a biofilm. An intermediate component (3 to 70 s) was related to other EPSs, while a distinguishable role was assigned to intact eDNA, which possesses a unique principal component with a time constant range (10 to 25 s) between those of EPS constituents. This implies that eDNA modulates its interaction with other matrix constituents to control its contribution to viscoelastic relaxation under mechanical stress.

Importance: The protection offered by biofilms to organisms that inhabit it against chemical and mechanical stresses is due in part to its matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in which biofilm organisms embed themselves. Mechanical stresses lead to deformation and possible detachment of biofilm organisms, and hence, rearrangement processes occur in a biofilm to relieve it from these stresses. Maxwell analysis of stress relaxation allows the determination of characteristic relaxation time constants, but the biofilm components and matrix constituents associated with different stress relaxation processes have never been identified. Here we grew biofilms with different matrix constituents and used principal-component analysis to reveal that the presence of water and soluble polysaccharides, together with the absence of bacteria, is associated with the fastest relaxation, while other EPSs control a second, slower relaxation. Extracellular DNA, as a matrix constituent, had a distinguishable role with its own unique principal component in stress relaxation with a time constant range between those of other EPSs.

Citing Articles

Staphylococcus epidermidis alters macrophage polarization and phagocytic uptake by extracellular DNA release in vitro.

Weisselberg S, Both A, Failla A, Huang J, Linder S, Ohnezeit D NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024; 10(1):131.

PMID: 39567551 PMC: 11579364. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-024-00604-7.


Unraveling the Formation of Ternary AgCuSe Crystalline Nanophases and Their Potential as Antibacterial Agents.

Lin M, Vargas B, Yedra L, van Gog H, van Huis M, Mendes R Chem Mater. 2024; 36(20):10154-10166.

PMID: 39464291 PMC: 11500304. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01604.


Antimicrobial efficiency and cytocompatibility of resveratrol and naringin as chemical decontaminants on SLA surface.

Zhou Y, Shen Z, Xu Y, Qian X, Chen W, Qiu J Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(10):e0367923.

PMID: 39240122 PMC: 11448033. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03679-23.


Understanding the flow behavior around marine biofilms.

Romeu M, Miranda J, de Jong E, Morais J, Vasconcelos V, Sjollema J Biofilm. 2024; 7:100204.

PMID: 38948680 PMC: 11214183. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100204.


Beyond the double helix: the multifaceted landscape of extracellular DNA in biofilms.

Bowden L, Finlinson J, Jones B, Berges B Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1400648.

PMID: 38903938 PMC: 11188362. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1400648.


References
1.
Stoodley P, Cargo R, Rupp C, Wilson S, Klapper I . Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002; 29(6):361-7. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jim.7000282. View

2.
Orgad O, Oren Y, Walker S, Herzberg M . The role of alginate in Pseudomonas aeruginosa EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties and cell attachment. Biofouling. 2011; 27(7):787-98. DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2011.603145. View

3.
Nielsen K, Johnsen P, Bensasson D, Daffonchio D . Release and persistence of extracellular DNA in the environment. Environ Biosafety Res. 2007; 6(1-2):37-53. DOI: 10.1051/ebr:2007031. View

4.
Schmid T, Burkhard J, Yeo B, Zhang W, Zenobi R . Towards chemical analysis of nanostructures in biofilms I: imaging of biological nanostructures. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008; 391(5):1899-905. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-008-2100-2. View

5.
Hu W, Li L, Sharma S, Wang J, McHardy I, Lux R . DNA builds and strengthens the extracellular matrix in Myxococcus xanthus biofilms by interacting with exopolysaccharides. PLoS One. 2013; 7(12):e51905. PMC: 3530553. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051905. View