» Articles » PMID: 24124960

Multiplicative Surrogate Standard Deviation: a Group Metric for the Glycemic Variability of Individual Hospitalized Patients

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2013 Oct 16
PMID 24124960
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Group metrics are described to quantify blood glucose (BG) variability of hospitalized patients.

Methods: The "multiplicative surrogate standard deviation" (MSSD) is the reverse-transformed group mean of the standard deviations (SDs) of the logarithmically transformed BG data set of each patient. The "geometric group mean" (GGM) is the reverse-transformed group mean of the means of the logarithmically transformed BG data set of each patient. Before reverse transformation is performed, the mean of means and mean of SDs each has its own SD, which becomes a multiplicative standard deviation (MSD) after reverse transformation. Statistical predictions and comparisons of parametric or nonparametric tests remain valid after reverse transformation. A subset of a previously published BG data set of 20 critically ill patients from the first 72 h of treatment under the SPRINT protocol was transformed logarithmically. After rank ordering according to the SD of the logarithmically transformed BG data of each patient, the cohort was divided into two equal groups, those having lower or higher variability.

Results: For the entire cohort, the GGM was 106 (÷/× 1.07) mg/dl, and MSSD was 1.24 (÷/× 1.07). For the subgroups having lower and higher variability, respectively, the GGM did not differ, 104 (÷/× 1.07) versus 109 (÷/× 1.07) mg/dl, but the MSSD differed, 1.17 (÷/× 1.03) versus 1.31 (÷/× 1.05), p = .00004.

Conclusions: By using the MSSD with its MSD, groups can be characterized and compared according to glycemic variability of individual patient members.

References
1.
Mackenzie I, Whitehouse T, Nightingale P . The metrics of glycaemic control in critical care. Intensive Care Med. 2011; 37(3):435-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-2103-2. View

2.
Rodbard D . A semilogarithmic scale for glucose provides a balanced view of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010; 3(6):1395-401. PMC: 2787040. DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300620. View

3.
Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M . Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2002; 345(19):1359-67. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa011300. View

4.
Meyfroidt G, Keenan D, Wang X, Wouters P, Veldhuis J, Van den Berghe G . Dynamic characteristics of blood glucose time series during the course of critical illness: effects of intensive insulin therapy and relative association with mortality. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38(4):1021-9. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cf710e. View

5.
Meynaar I, Eslami S, Abu-Hanna A, van der Voort P, de Lange D, de Keizer N . Blood glucose amplitude variability as predictor for mortality in surgical and medical intensive care unit patients: a multicenter cohort study. J Crit Care. 2012; 27(2):119-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.11.004. View