The Role of Health Literacy and Numeracy in Contraceptive Decision-making for Urban Chicago Women
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Low functional health literacy and numeracy have known associations with poor health outcomes, yet little work has investigated these markers of health disparity in a family planning population. We used an in-depth qualitative process and 2 literacy and numeracy assessment tools, the REALM-7 and the Schwartz numeracy scale, to assess the role of literacy and numeracy in contraceptive decision-making in an urban Chicago population. Brief surveys and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 postpartum women who had received Medicaid-funded care at an obstetrics clinic in an academic medical center. In-person one-on-one interviews were then reviewed for themes using an iterative process. Qualitative analysis techniques identifying emergent themes were applied to interview data. Literacy and numeracy were assessed using REALM-7 and a validated 3-question numeracy scale. In this cohort of African American (63 %) and Hispanic (37 %) women (median age 26), 73 % had unplanned pregnancies. Although health literacy rates on the REALM-7 were adequate, numeracy scores were low. Low literacy and numeracy scores were associated with interview reports of poor contraceptive knowledge and difficulty with contraceptive use. Low health literacy and numeracy may play an important role in contraception decision-making in this low-income, minority population of women. We recommend further study of literacy and numeracy in a family planning population. Comprehensive contraception education and communication around the contraceptive decision-making process should take place at literacy and numeracy levels appropriate to each individual.
Meherali S, Matthews B, Myhre D, Nisa S, Idrees S, Faraz A Womens Health (Lond). 2024; 20:17455057241291725.
PMID: 39565226 PMC: 11580089. DOI: 10.1177/17455057241291725.
Premusz V, Kovacs K, Skriba E, Tandor Z, Szmatona G, Dozsa-Juhasz O Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024; 5(4):627-642.
PMID: 39449387 PMC: 11503372. DOI: 10.3390/epidemiologia5040044.
Ghavami B, Sohrabi Z, RaisiDehkordi Z, Mohammadi F J Educ Health Promot. 2024; 13:105.
PMID: 38726088 PMC: 11081442. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_132_23.
Decision-making for congenital anomalies diagnosed during pregnancy: a narrative review.
Pecoriello J, Lilly A, Jalili D, Mendoza C, Quinn G, Penfield C J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(5):1143-1151.
PMID: 38630201 PMC: 11143132. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03112-x.
Odai-Afotey A, Lederman R, Ko N, Gagnon H, Fikre T, Gundersen D Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023; 200(1):127-137.
PMID: 37178432 PMC: 10182756. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06960-w.