» Articles » PMID: 24104782

Racial Disparities in the Treatment of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Overview
Journal Obstet Gynecol
Date 2013 Oct 10
PMID 24104782
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine whether treatment with guideline-recommended care (surgery and chemotherapy) is associated with mortality differences between black and white women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) linked to Medicare claims for 1995-2007. We evaluated long-term survival for 4,695 black and white women with stage III or stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression, and then in patients matched by propensity score to create two similar cohorts for comparison. We investigated the association between race, stage, and survival among women who were treated with guideline-recommended care and those who received incomplete treatment.

Results: Black women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer were more likely to die than white women (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.46). Black women were less likely than white women to receive guideline-recommended care (54% compared with 68%; P<.001), and women who did not receive recommended treatment had lower survival rates than women who received recommended care. Cox proportional hazards models demonstrated no differences in black women compared with white women regarding mortality among women who were treated with guideline-recommended care (adjusted HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.85-1.26), or among women who received incomplete treatment (adjusted HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.89-1.34). The survival analysis of patients matched by propensity score confirmed these analyses.

Conclusions: Differences in rates of treatment with guideline-recommended care are associated with black-white mortality disparities among women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Level Of Evidence: III.

Citing Articles

Exploring social determinants of health on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy severity in ovarian cancer: An integrative review.

Odii C, Vance D, Agbor F, Jenkins A, Smith E Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024; 55:101509.

PMID: 39376711 PMC: 11456880. DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101509.


Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among diverse patients with mutations at an urban public hospital: a mixed methods study.

Lamacki A, Spychalska S, Maga T, Balay L, Lugo Santiago N, Hoskins K BMJ Open. 2024; 14(6):e082608.

PMID: 38889943 PMC: 11191783. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082608.


Association of inflammation-related exposures and ovarian cancer survival in a multi-site cohort study of Black women.

Johnson C, Alberg A, Bandera E, Peres L, Akonde M, Collin L Br J Cancer. 2023; 129(7):1119-1125.

PMID: 37537254 PMC: 10539498. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02385-w.


Fear of recurrence, emotional well-being and quality of life among long-term advanced ovarian cancer survivors.

Osann K, Wenzel L, McKinney C, Wagner L, Cella D, Fulci G Gynecol Oncol. 2023; 171:151-158.

PMID: 36905875 PMC: 10681156. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.02.015.


Health-care access dimensions and ovarian cancer survival: SEER-Medicare analysis of the ORCHiD study.

Montes de Oca M, Chen Q, Howell E, Wilson L, Meernik C, Previs R JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023; 7(2).

PMID: 36794910 PMC: 10066801. DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad011.


References
1.
Rubin D . Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 127(8 Pt 2):757-63. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00064. View

2.
Bach P, Guadagnoli E, Schrag D, Schussler N, Warren J . Patient demographic and socioeconomic characteristics in the SEER-Medicare database applications and limitations. Med Care. 2002; 40(8 Suppl):IV-19-25. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200208001-00003. View

3.
Barnholtz-Sloan J, Tainsky M, Abrams J, Severson R, Qureshi F, Jacques S . Ethnic differences in survival among women with ovarian carcinoma. Cancer. 2002; 94(6):1886-93. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10415. View

4.
Cooper G, Virnig B, Klabunde C, Schussler N, Freeman J, Warren J . Use of SEER-Medicare data for measuring cancer surgery. Med Care. 2002; 40(8 Suppl):IV-43-8. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200208001-00006. View

5.
Potosky A, Warren J, Riedel E, Klabunde C, Earle C, Begg C . Measuring complications of cancer treatment using the SEER-Medicare data. Med Care. 2002; 40(8 Suppl):IV-62-8. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200208001-00009. View