» Articles » PMID: 24104402

Ultrasound Elastography in Children: Establishing the Normal Range of Muscle Elasticity

Overview
Journal Pediatr Radiol
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2013 Oct 10
PMID 24104402
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ultrasound elastography allows assessment of tissue elasticity. To the best of our knowledge, the elastography appearance of muscles in normal children has not been described.

Objective: To determine the US elasticity of muscles in children at rest and following exercise.

Materials And Methods: Cine elastography of biceps brachii and rectus femoris muscles was obtained at rest and after exercise in 42 healthy children (23 males, 19 females; mean: 11.2 ± 4.4 years, range: 2-18 years). Elastography scores were assigned to each clip based on a five-point color scale. Mean elastography scores and standard deviations were calculated and resting and postexercise elastography scores were compared.

Results: Resting muscle elasticity was lower in the biceps brachii than in the rectus femoris (P = 0.008), and higher in the dominant than in the nondominant biceps brachii (P < 0.032). Rectus femoris elasticity was higher in males than females (P = 0.051). Postexercise muscle elasticity significantly increased in both the dominant and nondominant biceps brachii (P < 0.001) and in the rectus femoris (P < 0.001). There was no significant gender-related difference in postexercise muscle elasticity. Biceps brachii elasticity decreased and rectus femoris elasticity increased with increasing body mass index. Younger subjects had a greater change in muscle elasticity with exercise.

Conclusion: Resting muscle elasticity in children is significantly lower in the biceps brachii than in the rectus femoris and in the nondominant biceps brachii than in the dominant biceps brachii. Elasticity significantly increases immediately postexercise in both muscle groups; resting differences between biceps brachii and rectus femoris elasticity, and dominant and nondominant biceps brachii elasticity, do not persist after exercise. The change in muscle elasticity with exercise is higher in younger children.

Citing Articles

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of lacrimal gland ultrasound elastography in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Zhang M, Pan J, Sheng J Int Ophthalmol. 2024; 44(1):271.

PMID: 38914728 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03185-8.


Quantifying lower limb muscle stiffness in typically developing children and adolescents using acoustic radiation force impulse shear wave elastography (ARFI/SWE)-a pilot study.

Chou W, Shieh J, Weng W, Lin C Skeletal Radiol. 2023; 53(6):1111-1118.

PMID: 38057435 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04534-x.


Could ultrasound and muscle elastography be associated with clinical assessment, laboratory and nailfold capillaroscopy in juvenile dermatomyositis patients?.

de Andrade R, Mendonca J, Piotto D, Brandao Guimaraes J, Terreri M Adv Rheumatol. 2023; 63(1):48.

PMID: 37803481 DOI: 10.1186/s42358-023-00330-2.


Ultrasound Elastography in Children.

Mocnik M, Marcun Varda N Children (Basel). 2023; 10(8).

PMID: 37628295 PMC: 10453784. DOI: 10.3390/children10081296.


Ultrasound elastography in children - nice to have for scientific studies or arrived in clinical routine?.

Mentzel H, Glutig K, Grager S, Kruger P, Waginger M Mol Cell Pediatr. 2022; 9(1):11.

PMID: 35668217 PMC: 9169959. DOI: 10.1186/s40348-022-00143-1.


References
1.
Kwon D, Park G . Diagnostic value of real-time sonoelastography in congenital muscular torticollis. J Ultrasound Med. 2012; 31(5):721-7. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.5.721. View

2.
Frank L, Wong E, Haseler L, Buxton R . Dynamic imaging of perfusion in human skeletal muscle during exercise with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med. 1999; 42(2):258-67. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199908)42:2<258::aid-mrm7>3.0.co;2-e. View

3.
Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T . Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006; 239(2):341-50. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2391041676. View

4.
Drakonaki E, Allen G, Wilson D . Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1019):1435-45. PMC: 3500785. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/93042867. View

5.
Klauser A, Peetrons P . Developments in musculoskeletal ultrasound and clinical applications. Skeletal Radiol. 2009; 39(11):1061-71. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-009-0782-y. View