Twelve-month Follow-up of Advance Provision of Emergency Contraception Among Teenage Girls in Sweden-a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal Ups J Med Sci

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2013 Oct 10

PMID 24102148

Citations 3

Authors

Maria Ekstrand

Tanja Tyden

Elisabeth Darj

Margareta Larsson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an intervention with advance provision of emergency contraceptive pills (ECP), condoms, and extended information to a targeted group of teenage girls, compared with a control group, 12 months after intervention.

Material And Methods: A randomized controlled trial among 420 girls, 15-19 years old, requesting emergency contraception at a youth clinic in Sweden was carried out. Data were collected by a questionnaire at the initial visit and structured telephone interviews 12 months after enrolment. Differences between the intervention group and the control group regarding ECP use, time interval from unprotected intercourse to ECP intake, contraceptive use, and sexual risk-taking were analysed.

Results: One year after the intervention 62% of the girls could be reached for follow-up. The girls in the intervention group reported a shorter time interval (mean 15.3 hours) from unprotected intercourse to ECP intake compared to the control group (mean 25.8 hours) (p = 0.019), without any evidence of decreased use of contraceptives or increased sexual risk-taking.

Conclusion: Even up to 12 months following the intervention, advance provision of ECP at one single occasion, to a specific target group of adolescent girls, shortens the time interval from unprotected intercourse to pill intake, without jeopardizing contraceptive use or increasing sexual risk-taking. Considering the clinical relevance of these results, we suggest that advance provision of ECP could be implemented as a routine preventive measure for this target group.

Citing Articles

Systematic review: risk sexual behavior, sexually transmitted infections, and adolescent pregnancy prevention interventions.

Gamelia E, Anies , Widjanarko B, Shaluhiyah Z J Public Health Afr. 2024; 14(12):2672.

PMID: 38204809 PMC: 10774857. DOI: 10.4081/jphia.2023.2672.

Effectiveness and Harms of Contraceptive Counseling and Provision Interventions for Women : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Nelson H, Cantor A, Jungbauer R, Eden K, Darney B, Ahrens K Ann Intern Med. 2022; 175(7):980-993.

PMID: 35605239 PMC: 10185303. DOI: 10.7326/M21-4380.

Emergency contraception. Widely available and effective but disappointing as a public health intervention: a review.

Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(4):751-60.

PMID: 25678571 PMC: 4447791. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev019.

References

Falk G, Falk L, Hanson U, Milsom I . Young women requesting emergency contraception are, despite contraceptive counseling, a high risk group for new unintended pregnancies. Contraception. 2001; 64(1):23-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00225-6. View

Foster D, Raine T, Brindis C, Rostovtseva D, Darney P . Should providers give women advance provision of emergency contraceptive pills? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Womens Health Issues. 2010; 20(4):242-7. PMC: 3153435. DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.03.003. View

Gold M, Wolford J, Smith K, Parker A . The effects of advance provision of emergency contraception on adolescent women's sexual and contraceptive behaviors. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004; 17(2):87-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2003.11.018. View

Baecher L, Weaver M, Raymond E . Increased access to emergency contraception: why it may fail. Hum Reprod. 2008; 24(4):815-9. PMC: 2721726. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den460. View

Ekstrand M, Larsson M, Darj E, Tyden T . Advance provision of emergency contraceptive pills reduces treatment delay: a randomised controlled trial among Swedish teenage girls. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87(3):354-9. DOI: 10.1080/00016340801936024. View

Polis C, Schaffer K, Blanchard K, Glasier A, Harper C, Grimes D . Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention (full review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (2):CD005497. PMC: 11270638. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005497.pub2. View

Raine T, Harper C, Rocca C, Fischer R, Padian N, Klausner J . Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005; 293(1):54-62. DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.1.54. View

Nelson A . Recent use of condoms and emergency contraception by women who selected condoms as their contraceptive method. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(6):1710-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.015. View

Larsson M, Aneblom G, Eurenius K, Westerling R, Tyden T . Limited impact of an intervention regarding emergency contraceptive pills in Sweden--repeated surveys among abortion applicants. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007; 11(4):270-6. DOI: 10.1080/13625180600766347. View

10.

Glasier A, Fairhurst K, Wyke S, Ziebland S, Seaman P, Walker J . Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates. Contraception. 2004; 69(5):361-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.01.002. View

11.

Meyer J, Gold M, Haggerty C . Advance provision of emergency contraception among adolescent and young adult women: a systematic review of literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2010; 24(1):2-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2010.06.002. View

12.

Schreiber C, Ratcliffe S, Barnhart K . A randomized controlled trial of the effect of advanced supply of emergency contraception in postpartum teens: a feasibility study. Contraception. 2010; 81(5):435-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.01.017. View