» Articles » PMID: 24101577

Breast Cancer Treatment Across Health Care Systems: Linking Electronic Medical Records and State Registry Data to Enable Outcomes Research

Abstract

Background: Understanding of cancer outcomes is limited by data fragmentation. In the current study, the authors analyzed the information yielded by integrating breast cancer data from 3 sources: electronic medical records (EMRs) from 2 health care systems and the state registry.

Methods: Diagnostic test and treatment data were extracted from the EMRs of all patients with breast cancer treated between 2000 and 2010 in 2 independent California institutions: a community-based practice (Palo Alto Medical Foundation; "Community") and an academic medical center (Stanford University; "University"). The authors incorporated records from the population-based California Cancer Registry and then linked EMR-California Cancer Registry data sets of Community and University patients.

Results: The authors initially identified 8210 University patients and 5770 Community patients; linked data sets revealed a 16% patient overlap, yielding 12,109 unique patients. The percentage of all Community patients, but not University patients, treated at both institutions increased with worsening cancer prognostic factors. Before linking the data sets, Community patients appeared to receive less intervention than University patients (mastectomy: 37.6% vs 43.2%; chemotherapy: 35% vs 41.7%; magnetic resonance imaging: 10% vs 29.3%; and genetic testing: 2.5% vs 9.2%). Linked Community and University data sets revealed that patients treated at both institutions received substantially more interventions (mastectomy: 55.8%; chemotherapy: 47.2%; magnetic resonance imaging: 38.9%; and genetic testing: 10.9% [P < .001 for each 3-way institutional comparison]).

Conclusions: Data linkage identified 16% of patients who were treated in 2 health care systems and who, despite comparable prognostic factors, received far more intensive treatment than others. By integrating complementary data from EMRs and population-based registries, a more comprehensive understanding of breast cancer care and factors that drive treatment use was obtained.

Citing Articles

Endocrine Therapy Interruption, Resumption, and Outcomes Associated With Pregnancy After Breast Cancer.

Ransohoff J, Lewinsohn R, Dickerson J, Luo I, Satoyoshi M, Ritter V JAMA Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 39946107 PMC: 11826432. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.6868.


Breast cancer learning health system: Patient information from a data and analytics platform characterizes care provided.

Levine M, Kemppainen J, Rosenberg M, Pettengell C, Bogach J, Whelan T Learn Health Syst. 2024; 8(3):e10409.

PMID: 39036532 PMC: 11257056. DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10409.


Implementing a Biomedical Data Warehouse From Blueprint to Bedside in a Regional French University Hospital Setting: Unveiling Processes, Overcoming Challenges, and Extracting Clinical Insight.

Karakachoff M, Goronflot T, Coudol S, Toublant D, Bazoge A, Constant Dit Beaufils P JMIR Med Inform. 2024; 12:e50194.

PMID: 38915177 PMC: 11217163. DOI: 10.2196/50194.


Use of Epic Electronic Health Record System for Health Care Research: Scoping Review.

Chishtie J, Sapiro N, Wiebe N, Rabatach L, Lorenzetti D, Leung A J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e51003.

PMID: 38100185 PMC: 10757236. DOI: 10.2196/51003.


Antimicrobial exposure is associated with decreased survival in triple-negative breast cancer.

Ransohoff J, Ritter V, Purington N, Andrade K, Han S, Liu M Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):2053.

PMID: 37045824 PMC: 10097670. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37636-0.


References
1.
Weber S, Lowe H, Das A, Ferris T . A simple heuristic for blindfolded record linkage. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012; 19(e1):e157-61. PMC: 3392854. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000329. View

2.
Bedrosian I, Hu C, Chang G . Population-based study of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and survival outcomes of breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102(6):401-9. PMC: 4415082. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq018. View

3.
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese R, Deutsch M, Fisher E . Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(16):1233-41. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa022152. View

4.
Kurian A, Edge S . Information technology interventions to improve cancer care quality: a report from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Care Symposium. J Oncol Pract. 2013; 9(3):142-4. PMC: 3651562. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000893. View

5.
Stewart A, McNamara E, Greer Gay E, Banasiak J, Winchester D . The Rapid Quality Reporting System--a new quality of care tool for CoC-accredited cancer programs. J Registry Manag. 2011; 38(1):61-3. View