» Articles » PMID: 24101089

Controversy Surrounding 'mini' Gastric Bypass

Overview
Journal Obes Surg
Date 2013 Oct 9
PMID 24101089
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mini gastric bypass is a modification of Mason loop gastric bypass with a longer lesser curvature-based pouch. Though it has been around for more than 15 years, its uptake by the bariatric community has been relatively slow, and the procedure has been mired in controversy right from its early days. Lately, there seems to be a surge in the interest in this procedure, and there is now published experience with more than 5,000 procedures globally. This review examines the major controversial aspects of this procedure against the available scientific literature. Surgeons performing this procedure need to be aware of these controversies and counsel their patients appropriately.

Citing Articles

Medium-Term Outcomes from a Series of 1000 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Australia: A Case Series.

Hailstone L, Tovmassian D, Nguyen C, Wong P, Le Page P, Martin D Obes Surg. 2024; 34(6):2111-2115.

PMID: 38609707 PMC: 11127843. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07213-5.


One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

Ali M, Wang Y, Ji J, Wang W, Wang D J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 27(10):2226-2244.

PMID: 37488422 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05782-x.


One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) Versus a 200-cm BPL, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Salman M, Salman A, Assal M, Elsherbiney M, Tourky M, Elewa A Obes Surg. 2023; 33(6):1846-1856.

PMID: 37022609 PMC: 10234867. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06556-9.


Single-anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal: a Mid-term Follow-up Report of a New Surgical Technique.

Rezaei M, Sheikhbahaei E, Zefreh H, Allami M, Sayadi Shahraki M, Shahabi S Obes Surg. 2023; 33(4):1245-1252.

PMID: 36847922 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06520-7.


Endoscopic and histopathological assessment of individuals undergoing one anastomosis gastric bypass: a 2-year follow-up.

Braga J, Callejas G, Costa L, Montes C, Chaim F, Gestic M Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(5):3720-3727.

PMID: 36650354 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09884-0.


References
1.
Noun R, Zeidan S . [Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: an effective option for the treatment of morbid obesity]. J Chir (Paris). 2007; 144(4):301-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-7697(07)91957-2. View

2.
Parrilla P, Lujan J, Robles R, Torralba J, Fuente T, CIFUENTES J . Duodenogastric reflux quantification in peptic ulcer surgery: comparison between different surgical techniques. Surgery. 1993; 113(1):43-7. View

3.
Nakagawara H, Miwa K, Nakamura S, Hattori T . Duodenogastric reflux sustains Helicobacter pylori infection in the gastric stump. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003; 38(9):931-7. DOI: 10.1080/00365520310005163. View

4.
Lorusso D, Linsalata M, Pezzolla F, Berloco P, Osella A, Guerra V . Duodenogastric reflux and gastric mucosal polyamines in the non-operated stomach and in the gastric remnant after Billroth II gastric resection. A role in gastric carcinogenesis?. Anticancer Res. 2000; 20(3B):2197-201. View

5.
Guo X, Yin K, Zhuo G, Chang X, Ding D, Zheng C . [Efficacy comparison between 2 methods of laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012; 15(11):1125-8. View