» Articles » PMID: 24096825

Distress, Problems and Supportive Care Needs of Patients Treated with Auto- or Allo-SCT

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2013 Oct 8
PMID 24096825
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hematological malignancies and treatment with hematopoietic SCT are known to affect patients' quality of life. The problem profile and care needs of this patient group need clarification, however. This study aimed to assess distress, problems and care needs after allo- or auto-SCT, and to identify risk factors for distress, problems or care needs. In this cross-sectional study, patients treated with allo-SCT or auto-SCT for hematological malignancies completed the Distress Thermometer and Problem List. Three patient groups were created: 0-1, 1-2.5 and 2.5-5.5 years after transplantation. After allo-SCT, distress and the number of problems tended to be lower with longer follow-up. After auto-SCT, distress was highest at 1-2.5 year(s). Patients mainly reported physical problems, followed by cognitive-emotional and practical problems. A minority reported care needs. Risk factors for distress as well as problems after allo-SCT included younger age, shorter time after transplantation and GVHD. A risk factor for distress as well as problems after auto-SCT was the presence of comorbid diseases. Up to 5 years after auto-SCT or allo-SCT, patients continue to experience distress and problems. Judged by prevalence, physical problems are first priority in supportive care, followed by cognitive-emotional and practical problems.

Citing Articles

Healthcare Professionals' Ratings and Views of Person-Centred Care in the Context of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

OSullivan A, Winterling J, Malmborg Kisch A, Bergkvist K, Edvardsson D, Wengstrom Y Health Serv Insights. 2025; 18:11786329241310735.

PMID: 39760071 PMC: 11694289. DOI: 10.1177/11786329241310735.


Patients' Experiences of Person-Centered Care in the Context of Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation.

OSullivan A, Hagelin C, Holmberg K, Bergkvist K, Bala S, Wengstrom Y Clin Nurs Res. 2024; 34(2):86-94.

PMID: 39663900 PMC: 11789425. DOI: 10.1177/10547738241302393.


Common patient-reported sources of cancer-related distress in adults with cancer: A systematic review.

Stevens J, Montgomery K, Miller M, Saeidzadeh S, Kwekkeboom K Cancer Med. 2024; 13(13):e7450.

PMID: 38989923 PMC: 11238242. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7450.


Toward an improved conceptualization of emotions in patients with cancer.

Dekker J, Doppenberg-Smit E, Braamse A, Lamers F, van Linde M, Verheul H Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1352026.

PMID: 38600981 PMC: 11004313. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1352026.


Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Snijders R, Brom L, Theunissen M, van den Beuken-van Everdingen M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36765547 PMC: 9913127. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030591.


References
1.
Li J, Girgis A . Supportive care needs: are patients with lung cancer a neglected population?. Psychooncology. 2005; 15(6):509-16. DOI: 10.1002/pon.983. View

2.
Roth A, Kornblith A, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Scher H, Holland J . Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer. 1998; 82(10):1904-8. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10<1904::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-x. View

3.
Lichtman M . Battling the hematological malignancies: the 200 years' war. Oncologist. 2008; 13(2):126-38. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0228. View

4.
Tuinman M, Gazendam-Donofrio S, Hoekstra-Weebers J . Screening and referral for psychosocial distress in oncologic practice: use of the Distress Thermometer. Cancer. 2008; 113(4):870-8. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23622. View

5.
Jacobsen P, Donovan K, Trask P, Fleishman S, Zabora J, Baker F . Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer. 2005; 103(7):1494-502. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20940. View