Self-reported Pleasantness Ratings and Examiner-Coded Defensiveness in Response to Touch in Children with ASD: Effects of Stimulus Material and Bodily Location

Overview

Journal J Autism Dev Disord

Publisher Springer

Date 2013 Oct 5

PMID 24091471

Citations 34

Authors

Carissa J Cascio

Jill Lorenzi

Grace T Baranek

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Tactile defensiveness, characterized by behavioral hyperresponsiveness and negative emotional responses to touch, is a common manifestation of aberrant sensory processing in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and other developmental disabilities (DD). Variations in tactile defensiveness with the properties of the stimulus and the bodily site of stimulation have been addressed in adults with self-report of perceived tactile pleasantness, but not in children. We presented three materials (pleasant, unpleasant, social) at three bodily sites and measured both examiner-coded defensiveness and self-reported pleasantness from a group of children with ASD and two comparison groups (one with DD, one with typical development (TD)). The main findings were: (1) children with ASD and DD showed significantly more defensiveness reactions and lower pleasantness ratings than the TD group, with higher variability, (2) there was a double dissociation for the effects of material and bodily site of stimulation: while bodily site predicted behavioral defensiveness, material predicted pleasantness rating. Additionally, it was noted that (3) the most pleasant material and the social touch conditions best distinguished ASD and DD from TD on defensiveness, and (4) within the ASD group, social impairment and defensiveness in bodily sites associated with social touch were positively correlated, suggesting a clinically relevant distinction between social and discriminative touch in ASD.

Citing Articles

Dynamic functional adaptations during touch observation in autism: connectivity strength is linked to attitudes towards social touch and social responsiveness.

Lee Masson H Mol Autism. 2025; 16(1):11.

PMID: 39966865 PMC: 11837348. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-025-00644-6.

Validation of the German Glasgow Sensory Questionnaire in autistic adults.

Jakob I, Roessner V, Ring M BMC Psychiatry. 2025; 25(1):86.

PMID: 39891105 PMC: 11786423. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-06504-0.

Sensory symptoms associated with autistic traits and anxiety levels in children aged 6-11 years.

Bang P, Andemichael D, Pieslinger J, Igelstrom K J Neurodev Disord. 2024; 16(1):45.

PMID: 39135156 PMC: 11318295. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-024-09562-9.

Intrinsic network abnormalities in children with autism spectrum disorder: an independent component analysis.

Yoon N, Kim S, Oh M, Kim M, Lee J, Kim B Brain Imaging Behav. 2024; 18(2):430-443.

PMID: 38324235 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-024-00858-x.

Differences in temporal profile of brain responses by pleasantness of somatosensory stimulation in autistic individuals.

Zoltowski A, Failla M, Quinde-Zlibut J, Dunham-Carr K, Moana-Filho E, Essick G Somatosens Mot Res. 2023; 42(1):1-16.

PMID: 38140831 PMC: 11193842. DOI: 10.1080/08990220.2023.2294715.

References

Ben-Sasson A, Hen L, Fluss R, Cermak S, Engel-Yeger B, Gal E . A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008; 39(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-008-0593-3. View

Foss-Feig J, Heacock J, Cascio C . TACTILE RESPONSIVENESS PATTERNS AND THEIR ASSOCIATION WITH CORE FEATURES IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2011; 6(1):337-344. PMC: 3207504. DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.06.007. View

Beebe B, Lachmann F, Markese S, Buck K, Bahrick L, Chen H . On the Origins of Disorganized Attachment and Internal Working Models: Paper II. An Empirical Microanalysis of 4-Month Mother-Infant Interaction. Psychoanal Dialogues. 2012; 22(3):352-374. PMC: 3469312. DOI: 10.1080/10481885.2012.679606. View

Rogers S, Ozonoff S . Annotation: what do we know about sensory dysfunction in autism? A critical review of the empirical evidence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005; 46(12):1255-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01431.x. View

Kientz M, Dunn W . A comparison of the performance of children with and without autism on the Sensory Profile. Am J Occup Ther. 1997; 51(7):530-7. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.51.7.530. View

Mottron L, Dawson M, Soulieres I, Hubert B, Burack J . Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: an update, and eight principles of autistic perception. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006; 36(1):27-43. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-005-0040-7. View

Boyd B, Baranek G, Sideris J, Poe M, Watson L, Patten E . Sensory features and repetitive behaviors in children with autism and developmental delays. Autism Res. 2010; 3(2):78-87. PMC: 3071028. DOI: 10.1002/aur.124. View

HARLOW H, HARLOW M . The effect of rearing conditions on behavior. Bull Menninger Clin. 1962; 26:213-24. View

McGlone F, Vallbo A, Olausson H, Loken L, Wessberg J . Discriminative touch and emotional touch. Can J Exp Psychol. 2007; 61(3):173-83. DOI: 10.1037/cjep2007019. View

10.

Leekam S, Nieto C, Libby S, Wing L, Gould J . Describing the sensory abnormalities of children and adults with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006; 37(5):894-910. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-006-0218-7. View

11.

Essick G, James A, McGlone F . Psychophysical assessment of the affective components of non-painful touch. Neuroreport. 1999; 10(10):2083-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199907130-00017. View

12.

Wong D, Baker C . Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs. 1988; 14(1):9-17. View

13.

Robertson A, Simmons D . The relationship between sensory sensitivity and autistic traits in the general population. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012; 43(4):775-84. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-012-1608-7. View

14.

Hertenstein M, Verkamp J, Kerestes A, Holmes R . The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: a review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2007; 132(1):5-94. DOI: 10.3200/mono.132.1.5-94. View

15.

Guest S, Dessirier J, Mehrabyan A, McGlone F, Essick G, Gescheider G . The development and validation of sensory and emotional scales of touch perception. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011; 73(2):531-50. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0037-y. View

16.

Main M, Stadtman J . Infant response to rejection of physical contact by the mother: aggression, avoidance, and conflict. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1981; 20(2):292-307. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-7138(09)60990-0. View

17.

Loken L, Wessberg J, Morrison I, McGlone F, Olausson H . Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12(5):547-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2312. View

18.

Baranek G, David F, Poe M, Stone W, Watson L . Sensory Experiences Questionnaire: discriminating sensory features in young children with autism, developmental delays, and typical development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006; 47(6):591-601. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01546.x. View

19.

Baranek G, Foster L, Berkson G . Tactile defensiveness and stereotyped behaviors. Am J Occup Ther. 1997; 51(2):91-5. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.51.2.91. View

20.

Little L, Freuler A, Houser M, Guckian L, Carbine K, David F . Psychometric validation of the Sensory Experiences Questionnaire. Am J Occup Ther. 2011; 65(2):207-10. PMC: 3163482. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2011.000844. View