» Articles » PMID: 24089338

Short-term Disturbance by a Commercial Two-dimensional Seismic Survey Does Not Lead to Long-term Displacement of Harbour Porpoises

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2013 Oct 4
PMID 24089338
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Assessments of the impact of offshore energy developments are constrained because it is not known whether fine-scale behavioural responses to noise lead to broader-scale displacement of protected small cetaceans. We used passive acoustic monitoring and digital aerial surveys to study changes in the occurrence of harbour porpoises across a 2000 km(2) study area during a commercial two-dimensional seismic survey in the North Sea. Acoustic and visual data provided evidence of group responses to airgun noise from the 470 cu inch array over ranges of 5-10 km, at received peak-to-peak sound pressure levels of 165-172 dB re 1 µPa and sound exposure levels (SELs) of 145-151 dB re 1 µPa(2) s(-1). However, animals were typically detected again at affected sites within a few hours, and the level of response declined through the 10 day survey. Overall, acoustic detections decreased significantly during the survey period in the impact area compared with a control area, but this effect was small in relation to natural variation. These results demonstrate that prolonged seismic survey noise did not lead to broader-scale displacement into suboptimal or higher-risk habitats, and suggest that impact assessments should focus on sublethal effects resulting from changes in foraging performance of animals within affected sites.

Citing Articles

Current species protection does not serve its porpoise-Knowledge gaps on the impact of pressures on the Critically Endangered Baltic Proper harbour porpoise population, and future recommendations for its protection.

Koschinski S, Owen K, Lehnert K, Kaminska K Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(9):e70156.

PMID: 39267689 PMC: 11392595. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70156.


Navigating the unknown: assessing anthropogenic threats to beaked whales, family Ziphiidae.

Feyrer L, Stanistreet J, Moors-Murphy H R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(4):240058.

PMID: 38633351 PMC: 11021932. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240058.


What the F-POD? Comparing the F-POD and C-POD for monitoring of harbor porpoise ().

Todd N, Kavanagh A, Rogan E, Jessopp M Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(6):e10186.

PMID: 37304366 PMC: 10256617. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10186.


Estimating the abundance of the critically endangered Baltic Proper harbour porpoise () population using passive acoustic monitoring.

Amundin M, Carlstrom J, Thomas L, Carlen I, Teilmann J, Tougaard J Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(2):e8554.

PMID: 35222950 PMC: 8858216. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8554.


The Click Production of Captive Yangtze Finless Porpoises () Is Influenced by Social and Environmental Factors.

Serres A, Xu C, Hao Y, Wang D Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(2).

PMID: 33669231 PMC: 7919832. DOI: 10.3390/ani11020511.


References
1.
Stocker M . Noisy oil exploration disrupts marine life. Nature. 2011; 473(7347):285. DOI: 10.1038/473285b. View

2.
Lucke K, Siebert U, Lepper P, Blanchet M . Temporary shift in masked hearing thresholds in a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) after exposure to seismic airgun stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 125(6):4060-70. DOI: 10.1121/1.3117443. View

3.
Brookes K, Bailey H, Thompson P . Predictions from harbor porpoise habitat association models are confirmed by long-term passive acoustic monitoring. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 134(3):2523-33. DOI: 10.1121/1.4816577. View

4.
Thomas L, Buckland S, Rexstad E, Laake J, Strindberg S, Hedley S . Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J Appl Ecol. 2010; 47(1):5-14. PMC: 2847204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.x. View

5.
Kyhn L, Tougaard J, Thomas L, Duve L, Stenback J, Amundin M . From echolocation clicks to animal density--acoustic sampling of harbor porpoises with static dataloggers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 131(1):550-60. DOI: 10.1121/1.3662070. View