» Articles » PMID: 24088974

Low-energy Fractures Without Low T-scores Characteristic of Osteoporosis: a Possible Bone Matrix Disorder

Overview
Date 2013 Oct 4
PMID 24088974
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Osteoporotic fractures commonly occur after low-energy trauma in postmenopausal women with reduced bone quantity documented by low bone mineral density (BMD). Low-energy fractures, however, have also been reported to occur in premenopausal women with normal or near-normal BMD, suggesting the existence of a bone quality abnormality.

Methods: Bone quality and quantity were evaluated in a cross-sectional study of three groups of premenopausal white females: (1) twenty-five subjects with low-energy fracture(s) and BMD in the normal range (t-scores > -2.0), (2) eighteen subjects with low-energy fracture(s) and BMD in the osteoporotic range (t-scores ≤ -2.5), and (3) fourteen healthy volunteers (controls). Bone quality was assessed with use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and histomorphometry in iliac crest bone samples obtained from all subjects; bone quantity was assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry and histomorphometry.

Results: The collagen crosslinking ratio in the non-low-BMD subjects with fractures was 13% greater than the ratio in the low-BMD subjects with fractures and 14% greater than the ratio in the controls (p < 0.001 for both). Cancellous bone volume was 29% greater (p < 0.01) and trabecular separation was 31% less (p < 0.01) in the non-low-BMD subjects with fractures than in the low-BMD subjects with fractures; the values in the non-low-BMD subjects did not differ from those in the controls. Bone turnover did not differ among the groups, and osteomalacia was not present in any subject. Thus, the non-low-BMD subjects with fractures maintained bone quantity, but the collagen crosslinking ratio, a parameter of bone quality, was abnormal. In contrast, the low-BMD subjects with fractures did not have this collagen crosslinking abnormality but did have abnormal bone quantity.

Conclusions: This study highlights a collagen crosslinking abnormality in patients with low-energy fractures and nonosteoporotic t-scores. Reports have indicated that altered collagen crosslinking is associated with subnormal fracture resistance. A finding of nonosteoporotic bone mass in a patient with low-energy fractures would justify assessment of bone material quality, which currently requires a bone biopsy. Further studies are needed to search for possible noninvasive tests to diagnose abnormal crosslinking. Since no specific therapies for abnormal collagen crosslinking are currently available, studies are also needed to explore novel therapeutic modalities to reverse the underlying collagen crosslinking abnormality.

Level Of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Enzymatic and Non-enzymatic Collagen Cross-Links and Fracture Occurrence in Type 1 Diabetes Patients.

Paschalis E, Gamsjaeger S, Graeff-Armas L, Bare S, Recker R, Akhter M Calcif Tissue Int. 2024; 115(3):328-333.

PMID: 38871838 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-024-01243-y.


Tgif1-deficiency impairs cytoskeletal architecture in osteoblasts by activating PAK3 signaling.

Bolamperti S, Saito H, Heerdmann S, Hesse E, Taipaleenmaki H Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 38661167 PMC: 11045221. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.94265.


Bone intrinsic material and compositional properties in postmenopausal women diagnosed with long-term Type-1 diabetes.

Qian W, Gamsjaeger S, Paschalis E, Graeff-Armas L, Bare S, Turner J Bone. 2023; 174:116832.

PMID: 37385427 PMC: 11302406. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116832.


Bone collagen quality in lumbar fusion patients: the association between volumetric bone mineral density and advanced glycation endproducts.

Haffer H, Chiapparelli E, Muellner M, Moser M, Dodo Y, Reisener M Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(5):1678-1687.

PMID: 36922425 PMC: 10623215. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07589-5.


Management of fracture risk in CKD-traditional and novel approaches.

Haarhaus M, Aaltonen L, Cejka D, Cozzolino M, de Jong R, DHaese P Clin Kidney J. 2023; 16(3):456-472.

PMID: 36865010 PMC: 9972845. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac230.


References
1.
. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994; 843:1-129. View

2.
Viidik A, Mosekilde L . Correlation between the compressive strength of iliac and vertebral trabecular bone in normal individuals. Bone. 1985; 6(5):291-5. DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(85)90317-5. View

3.
Moreira Kulak C, Schussheim D, McMahon D, Kurland E, Silverberg S, Siris E . Osteoporosis and low bone mass in premenopausal and perimenopausal women. Endocr Pract. 2001; 6(4):296-304. DOI: 10.4158/EP.6.4.296. View

4.
Parfitt A, Drezner M, Glorieux F, Kanis J, MALLUCHE H, Meunier P . Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res. 1987; 2(6):595-610. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650020617. View

5.
Paschalis E, Verdelis K, Doty S, Boskey A, Mendelsohn R, Yamauchi M . Spectroscopic characterization of collagen cross-links in bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2001; 16(10):1821-8. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.10.1821. View