» Articles » PMID: 24084757

A Coupled Sensor-spectrophotometric Device for Continuous Measurement of Formaldehyde in Indoor Environments

Overview
Date 2013 Oct 3
PMID 24084757
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite long-standing awareness of adverse health effects associated with chronic human exposure to formaldehyde, this hazardous air pollutant remains a challenge to measure in indoor environments. Traditional analytical techniques evaluate formaldehyde concentrations over several hours to several days in a single location in a residence, making it difficult to characterize daily temporal and spatial variation in human exposure to formaldehyde. There is a need for portable, easy-to-use devices that are specific and sensitive to gas-phase formaldehyde over short sampling periods so that dynamic processes governing formaldehyde fate, transport, and potential remediation in indoor environments may be studied more effectively. A recently developed device couples a chemical sensor element with spectrophotometric analysis for detection and quantification of part per billion (ppbv) gas-phase formaldehyde concentrations. This study established the ability of the coupled sensor-spectrophotometric device (CSSD) to report formaldehyde concentrations accurately and continuously on a 30-min sampling cycle at low ppbv concentrations previously untested for this device in a laboratory setting. Determination of the method detection limit (MDL), based on 40 samples each at test concentrations of 5 and 10 ppbv, was found to be 1.9 and 2.0 ppbv, respectively. Performance of the CSSD was compared with the dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) derivatization method for formaldehyde concentrations ranging from 5-50 ppbv, and a linear relationship with a coefficient of determination of 0.983 was found between these two analytical techniques. The CSSD was also used to monitor indoor formaldehyde concentrations in two manufactured homes. During this time, formaldehyde concentrations varied from below detection limit to 65 ppbv and were above the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommended exposure limit (REL) of 16 ppbv, which is also the exposure limit value now adopted by the US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to procure manufactured housing, 80% and 100% of the time, respectively.

Citing Articles

Formaldehyde Concentrations in a Net-Zero Energy House: Real-time Monitoring and Simulation.

Poppendieck D, Khurshid S, Dols W, Ng L, Polidoro B, Emmerich S Indoor Air Int Conf Indoor Air Qual Clim. 2021; NA:992-999.

PMID: 34195698 PMC: 8240952.

References
1.
Gordon S, Callahan P, Nishioka M, Brinkman M, ORourke M, LEBOWITZ M . Residential environmental measurements in the national human exposure assessment survey (NHEXAS) pilot study in Arizona: preliminary results for pesticides and VOCs. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1999; 9(5):456-70. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500042. View

2.
OBrien P, Siraki A, Shangari N . Aldehyde sources, metabolism, molecular toxicity mechanisms, and possible effects on human health. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006; 35(7):609-62. DOI: 10.1080/10408440591002183. View

3.
Barro R, Regueiro J, Llompart M, Garcia-Jares C . Analysis of industrial contaminants in indoor air: part 1. Volatile organic compounds, carbonyl compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls. J Chromatogr A. 2008; 1216(3):540-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.117. View

4.
Hodgson A, Rudd A, Beal D, Chandra S . Volatile organic compound concentrations and emission rates in new manufactured and site-built houses. Indoor Air. 2000; 10(3):178-92. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010003178.x. View

5.
Barker L, Luman E, McCauley M, Chu S . Assessing equivalence: an alternative to the use of difference tests for measuring disparities in vaccination coverage. Am J Epidemiol. 2002; 156(11):1056-61. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwf149. View