» Articles » PMID: 24083346

Identification of Factors for Improved Ethylene Production Via the Ethylene Forming Enzyme in Chemostat Cultures of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2013 Oct 3
PMID 24083346
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Biotechnological production of the traditional petrochemical ethylene is presently being explored using yeasts as well as bacteria. In this study we quantify the specific ethylene production levels at different conditions in continuous (chemostat) cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisae expressing the ethylene forming enzyme (EFE) from Pseudomonas syringae.

Results: Our study shows that oxygen availability is an important factor for the ethylene formation. Maintaining a high percentage dissolved oxygen in the cultivation was found to be necessary to achieve maximal ethylene productivity. Even at oxygen levels high enough to sustain respiratory metabolism the ethylene formation was restricted. Oxygen was also important for sustaining a high respiratory rate and to re-oxidize the surplus of NADH that accompanies ethylene formation. By employing three different nitrogen sources we further found that the nitrogen source available can both improve and impair the ethylene productivity. Contrary to findings in batch cultures, using glutamate did not give a significant increase in specific ethylene production levels compared to the reference condition with ammonia, whereas a combination of glutamate and arginine resulted in a strongly diminished specific ethylene production. Furthermore, from cultivations at different dilution rates the ethylene formation was found to be coupled to growth rate.

Conclusion: To optimize the ethylene productivity in S. cerevisiae expressing a bacterial ethylene forming enzyme, controlling the oxygen availability and growth rate as well as employing an ideal nitrogen source is of importance. The effects of these factors as studied here provide a basis for an optimized process for ethylene production in S. cerevisiae.

Citing Articles

Optimal energy and redox metabolism in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.

Kugler A, Stensjo K NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2023; 9(1):47.

PMID: 37739963 PMC: 10516873. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-023-00307-3.


Metabolic engineering of Zymomonas moblis for ethylene production from straw hydrolysate.

He Y, Wu B, Xia W, Zhao K, Qin Y, Tan Q Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021; 105(4):1709-1720.

PMID: 33512573 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11091-7.


Production of mannosylglycerate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering and bioprocess optimization.

Faria C, Borges N, Rocha I, Santos H Microb Cell Fact. 2018; 17(1):178.

PMID: 30445960 PMC: 6240254. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-018-1023-7.


Bio-production of gaseous alkenes: ethylene, isoprene, isobutene.

Wilson J, Gering S, Pinard J, Lucas R, Briggs B Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018; 11:234.

PMID: 30181774 PMC: 6114056. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1230-9.


Structures and Mechanisms of the Non-Heme Fe(II)- and 2-Oxoglutarate-Dependent Ethylene-Forming Enzyme: Substrate Binding Creates a Twist.

Martinez S, Fellner M, Herr C, Ritchie A, Hu J, Hausinger R J Am Chem Soc. 2017; 139(34):11980-11988.

PMID: 28780854 PMC: 5599930. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b06186.


References
1.
Otterstedt K, Larsson C, Bill R, Stahlberg A, Boles E, Hohmann S . Switching the mode of metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO Rep. 2004; 5(5):532-7. PMC: 1299050. DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400132. View

2.
Larsson C, Snoep J, Norbeck J, Albers E . Flux balance analysis for ethylene formation in genetically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. IET Syst Biol. 2011; 5(4):245-51. DOI: 10.1049/iet-syb.2010.0027. View

3.
Weingart H, Volksch B, Ullrich M . Comparison of Ethylene Production by Pseudomonas syringae and Ralstonia solanacearum. Phytopathology. 2008; 89(5):360-5. DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.5.360. View

4.
Weusthuis R, Visser W, Pronk J, Scheffers W, van Dijken J . Effects of oxygen limitation on sugar metabolism in yeasts: a continuous-culture study of the Kluyver effect. Microbiology (Reading). 1994; 140 ( Pt 4):703-15. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-140-4-703. View

5.
Frick O, Wittmann C . Characterization of the metabolic shift between oxidative and fermentative growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by comparative 13C flux analysis. Microb Cell Fact. 2005; 4:30. PMC: 1291395. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-4-30. View