» Articles » PMID: 24071776

Development of a Virtual Reality Training Curriculum for Phacoemulsification Surgery

Overview
Journal Eye (Lond)
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2013 Sep 28
PMID 24071776
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Training within a proficiency-based virtual reality (VR) curriculum may reduce errors during real surgical procedures. This study used a scientific methodology to develop a VR training curriculum for phacoemulsification surgery (PS).

Patients And Methods: Ten novice-(n) (performed <10 cataract operations), 10 intermediate-(i) (50-200), and 10 experienced-(e) (>500) surgeons were recruited. Construct validity was defined as the ability to differentiate between the three levels of experience, based on the simulator-derived metrics for two abstract modules (four tasks) and three procedural modules (five tasks) on a high-fidelity VR simulator. Proficiency measures were based on the performance of experienced surgeons.

Results: Abstract modules demonstrated a 'ceiling effect' with construct validity established between groups (n) and (i) but not between groups (i) and (e)-Forceps 1 (46, 87, and 95; P<0.001). Increasing difficulty of task showed significantly reduced performance in (n) but minimal difference for (i) and (e)-Anti-tremor 4 (0, 51, and 59; P<0.001), Forceps 4 (11, 73, and 94; P<0.001). Procedural modules were found to be construct valid between groups (n) and (i) and between groups (i) and (e)-Lens-cracking (0, 22, and 51; P<0.05) and Phaco-quadrants (16, 53, and 87; P<0.05). This was also the case with Capsulorhexis (0, 19, and 63; P<0.05) with the performance decreasing in the (n) and (i) group but improving in the (e) group (0, 55, and 73; P<0.05) and (0, 48, and 76; P<0.05) as task difficulty increased.

Conclusion: Experienced/intermediate benchmark skill levels are defined allowing the development of a proficiency-based VR training curriculum for PS for novices using a structured scientific methodology.

Citing Articles

Validity evidence of a new virtual reality simulator for phacoemulsification training in cataract surgery.

Yaici R, Poirot J, Dormegny L, Neumann N, Bazarya E, Solecki L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25524.

PMID: 39461993 PMC: 11513110. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76405-x.


National Access to EyeSi Simulation: A Comparative Study Among U.S. Ophthalmology Residency Programs.

Oseni J, Adebayo A, Raval N, Moon J, Juthani V, Chuck R J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2024; 15(1):e112-e118.

PMID: 38737163 PMC: 10804742. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768933.


The bibliometric analysis of extended reality in surgical training: Global and Chinese perspective.

Li W, Ma S, Zhou L, Konge L, Pan J, Hui J Heliyon. 2024; 10(5):e27340.

PMID: 38495188 PMC: 10943385. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27340.


Using the language of surgery to enhance ophthalmology surgical education.

Pan-Doh N, Sikder S, Woreta F, Handa J Surg Open Sci. 2023; 14:52-59.

PMID: 37528917 PMC: 10387608. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.07.002.


Wet Laboratory Training in Ophthalmology as a Tool for Formative Assessment.

Bhagat P, Jethva J Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2023; 12(4):228-233.

PMID: 36726655 PMC: 9886154. DOI: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_334_22.


References
1.
Aggarwal R, Tully A, Grantcharov T, Larsen C, Miskry T, Farthing A . Virtual reality simulation training can improve technical skills during laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. BJOG. 2006; 113(12):1382-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01148.x. View

2.
Privett B, Greenlee E, Rogers G, Oetting T . Construct validity of a surgical simulator as a valid model for capsulorhexis training. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36(11):1835-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.020. View

3.
Spitz L, Kiely E, Peirro A, Drake D, McAndrew F . Decline in surgical training. Lancet. 2002; 359(9300):83. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07307-5. View

4.
Le T, Adatia F, Lam W . Virtual reality ophthalmic surgical simulation as a feasible training and assessment tool: results of a multicentre study. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011; 46(1):56-60. DOI: 10.3129/i10-051. View

5.
Mackay S, Morgan P, Datta V, Chang A, Darzi A . Practice distribution in procedural skills training: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16(6):957-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9132-4. View