» Articles » PMID: 24065038

Lung Deposition Analyses of Inhaled Toxic Aerosols in Conventional and Less Harmful Cigarette Smoke: a Review

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2013 Sep 26
PMID 24065038
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Inhaled toxic aerosols of conventional cigarette smoke may impact not only the health of smokers, but also those exposed to second-stream smoke, especially children. Thus, less harmful cigarettes (LHCs), also called potential reduced exposure products (PREPs), or modified risk tobacco products (MRTP) have been designed by tobacco manufacturers to focus on the reduction of the concentration of carcinogenic components and toxicants in tobacco. However, some studies have pointed out that the new cigarette products may be actually more harmful than the conventional ones due to variations in puffing or post-puffing behavior, different physical and chemical characteristics of inhaled toxic aerosols, and longer exposure conditions. In order to understand the toxicological impact of tobacco smoke, it is essential for scientists, engineers and manufacturers to develop experiments, clinical investigations, and predictive numerical models for tracking the intake and deposition of toxicants of both LHCs and conventional cigarettes. Furthermore, to link inhaled toxicants to lung and other diseases, it is necessary to determine the physical mechanisms and parameters that have significant impacts on droplet/vapor transport and deposition. Complex mechanisms include droplet coagulation, hygroscopic growth, condensation and evaporation, vapor formation and changes in composition. Of interest are also different puffing behavior, smoke inlet conditions, subject geometries, and mass transfer of deposited material into systemic regions. This review article is intended to serve as an overview of contributions mainly published between 2009 and 2013, focusing on the potential health risks of toxicants in cigarette smoke, progress made in different approaches of impact analyses for inhaled toxic aerosols, as well as challenges and future directions.

Citing Articles

Reprint of: Smoking and pulmonary health in women: A narrative review and behavioral health perspective.

Menson K, Coleman S Prev Med. 2024; 188:108113.

PMID: 39198081 PMC: 11563853. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108113.


Impact of different ventilation conditions on tobacco smoke-associated particulate matter emissions in a car cabin using the TAPaC platform.

Pitten L, Bruggmann D, Droge J, Braun M, Groneberg D Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):8216.

PMID: 37217504 PMC: 10203320. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35208-2.


Influence of E-Liquid Humectants, Nicotine, and Flavorings on Aerosol Particle Size Distribution and Implications for Modeling Respiratory Deposition.

Stefaniak A, Ranpara A, Virji M, LeBouf R Front Public Health. 2022; 10:782068.

PMID: 35372219 PMC: 8968757. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.782068.


Effect of MDI Actuation Timing on Inhalation Dosimetry in a Human Respiratory Tract Model.

Talaat M, Si X, Xi J Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022; 15(1).

PMID: 35056118 PMC: 8777964. DOI: 10.3390/ph15010061.


Innovating on Inhaled Bioequivalence: A Critical Analysis of the Current Limitations, Potential Solutions and Stakeholders of the Process.

Gallegos-Catalan J, Warnken Z, Bahamondez-Canas T, Moraga-Espinoza D Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(7).

PMID: 34371741 PMC: 8309038. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13071051.


References
1.
Hecht S . Tobacco carcinogens, their biomarkers and tobacco-induced cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003; 3(10):733-44. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1190. View

2.
Yu L, Dzikovski B, Freed J . A protocol for detecting and scavenging gas-phase free radicals in mainstream cigarette smoke. J Vis Exp. 2012; (59):e3406. PMC: 3369772. DOI: 10.3791/3406. View

3.
Zenzen V, Diekmann J, Gerstenberg B, Weber S, Wittke S, Schorp M . Reduced exposure evaluation of an Electrically Heated Cigarette Smoking System. Part 2: Smoke chemistry and in vitro toxicological evaluation using smoking regimens reflecting human puffing behavior. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012; 64(2 Suppl):S11-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.08.004. View

4.
Benowitz N, Henningfield J . Reducing the nicotine content to make cigarettes less addictive. Tob Control. 2013; 22 Suppl 1:i14-7. PMC: 3632983. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050860. View

5.
Barua R, Ambrose J . Mechanisms of coronary thrombosis in cigarette smoke exposure. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013; 33(7):1460-7. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300154. View