» Articles » PMID: 24058460

An H∞ Strategy for Strain Estimation in Ultrasound Elastography Using Biomechanical Modeling Constraint

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Sep 24
PMID 24058460
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of ultrasound elastography is to identify lesions by reconstructing the hardness characteristics of tissue reconstructed from ultrasound data. Conventional quasi-static ultrasound elastography is easily applied to obtain axial strain components along the compression direction, with the results inverted to represent the distribution of tissue hardness under the assumption of constant internal stresses. However, previous works of quasi-static ultrasound elastography have found it difficult to obtain the lateral and shear strain components, due to the poor lateral resolution of conventional ultrasound probes. The physical nature of the strain field is a continuous vector field, which should be fully described by the axial, lateral, and shear strain components, and the clinical value of lateral and shear strain components of deformed tissue is gradually being recognized by both engineers and clinicians. Therefore, a biomechanical-model-constrained filtering framework is proposed here for recovering a full displacement field at a high spatial resolution from the noisy ultrasound data. In our implementation, after the biomechanical model constraint is integrated into the state-space equation, both the axial and lateral displacement components can be recovered at a high spatial resolution from the noisy displacement measurements using a robust H∞ filter, which only requires knowledge of the worst-case noise levels in the measurements. All of the strain components can then be calculated by applying a gradient operator to the recovered displacement field. Numerical experiments on synthetic data demonstrated the robustness and effectiveness of our approach, and experiments on phantom data and in-vivo clinical data also produced satisfying results.

Citing Articles

Application of ultrasonography in monitoring the complications of autologous arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients.

Ren C, Chen J, Wang Y, Huang B, Lu W, Cao Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(44):e12994.

PMID: 30383654 PMC: 6221746. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012994.


Cross-talk between shoulder and neck pain: an imaging study of association between rotator cuff tendon tears and cervical foraminal stenosis.

Wu W, Chang K, Han D, Lin C, Ozcakar L Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(36):e12247.

PMID: 30200155 PMC: 6133567. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012247.


Recovering vector displacement estimates in quasistatic elastography using sparse relaxation of the momentum equation.

Babaniyi O, Oberai A, Barbone P Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2017; 25(3):326-362.

PMID: 29250128 PMC: 5730099. DOI: 10.1080/17415977.2016.1161034.


High-pitch, low-voltage and low-iodine-concentration CT angiography of aorta: assessment of image quality and radiation dose with iterative reconstruction.

Shen Y, Sun Z, Xu L, Li Y, Zhang N, Yan Z PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0117469.

PMID: 25643353 PMC: 4314070. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117469.

References
1.
Chung J, Rajagopal V, Nielsen P, Nash M . A biomechanical model of mammographic compressions. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2007; 7(1):43-52. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-006-0074-6. View

2.
Cespedes I, Ophir J . Reduction of image noise in elastography. Ultrason Imaging. 1993; 15(2):89-102. DOI: 10.1177/016173469301500202. View

3.
Zahiri-Azar R, Salcudean S . Motion estimation in ultrasound images using time domain cross correlation with prior estimates. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006; 53(10):1990-2000. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2006.881780. View

4.
Doyley M, Meaney P, Bamber J . Evaluation of an iterative reconstruction method for quantitative elastography. Phys Med Biol. 2000; 45(6):1521-40. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/6/309. View

5.
Zhou Y, Zheng Y . A motion estimation refinement framework for real-time tissue axial strain estimation with freehand ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2010; 57(9):1943-51. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1642. View