» Articles » PMID: 24051434

Tolerability of Intramuscular and Intradermal Delivery by CELLECTRA(®) Adaptive Constant Current Electroporation Device in Healthy Volunteers

Overview
Date 2013 Sep 21
PMID 24051434
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA vaccines are being developed as a potentially safe and effective immunization platform. However, translation of DNA vaccines into a clinical setting has produced results that have fallen short of those generated in a preclinical setting. Various strategies are being developed to address this lack of potency, including improvements in delivery methods. Electroporation (EP) creates transient increases in cell membrane permeability, thus enhancing DNA uptake and leading to a more robust immune response. Here, we report on the safety and tolerability of delivering sterile saline via intramuscular (IM) or intradermal (ID) injection followed by in vivo electroporation using the CELLECTRA(®) adaptive constant current device in healthy adults from two open-label studies. Pain, as assessed by VAS, was highest immediately after EP but diminishes by about 50% within 5 min. Mean VAS scores appear to correlate with the amount of energy delivered and depth of needle insertion, especially for intramuscular EP. Mean scores did not exceed 7 out of 10 or 3 out of 10 for IM and ID EP, respectively. The majority of adverse events included mild to moderate injection site reactions that resolved within one day. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported during the course of either study. Overall, injection followed by EP with the CELLECTRA(®) device was well-tolerated and no significant safety concerns were identified. These studies support the further development of electroporation as a vaccine delivery method to enhance immunogenicity, particularly for diseases in which traditional vaccination approaches are ineffective.

Citing Articles

Tolerability of a piezoelectric microneedle electroporator in human subjects.

Lu C, Rohilla P, Felner E, Byagathvalli G, Azizoglu E, Bhamla M Bioeng Transl Med. 2024; 9(4):e10662.

PMID: 39036075 PMC: 11256137. DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10662.


Safety and Immunogenicity of an Muscle Electroporation Delivery System for DNA- Tuberculosis Vaccine in Cynomolgus Monkeys.

de Lima M, Leandro A, de Souza A, Barradas M, Roma E, Fernandes A Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38140266 PMC: 10747856. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11121863.


Intradermal DNA vaccine delivery using vacuum-controlled, needle-free electroporation.

Generotti A, Contreras R, Zounes B, Schade E, Kemme A, Rane Y Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2023; 34:102070.

PMID: 38034030 PMC: 10682253. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2023.102070.


DNA Vaccines for Epidemic Preparedness: SARS-CoV-2 and Beyond.

Maslow J, Kwon I, Kudchodkar S, Kane D, Tadesse A, Lee H Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(6).

PMID: 37376404 PMC: 10302025. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061016.


Lassa fever vaccine candidates: A scoping review of vaccine clinical trials.

Sulis G, Peebles A, Basta N Trop Med Int Health. 2023; 28(6):420-431.

PMID: 37095630 PMC: 10247453. DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13876.


References
1.
Tobin D . Biochemistry of human skin--our brain on the outside. Chem Soc Rev. 2005; 35(1):52-67. DOI: 10.1039/b505793k. View

2.
Brave A, Nystrom S, Roos A, Applequist S . Plasmid DNA vaccination using skin electroporation promotes poly-functional CD4 T-cell responses. Immunol Cell Biol. 2010; 89(3):492-6. DOI: 10.1038/icb.2010.109. View

3.
van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk S, Hannaman D . Electroporation for DNA immunization: clinical application. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2010; 9(5):503-17. DOI: 10.1586/erv.10.42. View

4.
Rosati M, Bergamaschi C, Valentin A, Kulkarni V, Jalah R, Alicea C . DNA vaccination in rhesus macaques induces potent immune responses and decreases acute and chronic viremia after SIVmac251 challenge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(37):15831-6. PMC: 2734879. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0902628106. View

5.
Babiuk S, Baca-Estrada M, Foldvari M, Middleton D, Rabussay D, Widera G . Increased gene expression and inflammatory cell infiltration caused by electroporation are both important for improving the efficacy of DNA vaccines. J Biotechnol. 2004; 110(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.01.015. View