» Articles » PMID: 24048701

Youth Who Sexual Offended: Primary Human Goods and Offense Pathways

Overview
Journal Sex Abuse
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2013 Sep 20
PMID 24048701
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has been an increased focus on understanding youth sexual offending in recent years, but there has been limited empirical research on the causes, pathways, and treatment of youth who have sexually offended-especially within a non-Western context. The Good Lives and Self-Regulation Models have often been used to understand and rehabilitate adult sexual offenders, but (unfortunately) there is scant research on youth who sexually offended using these models. The present study aims to describe the different primary goods that are associated with youth sexual offending behaviors in an Asian context. In addition, the study sought to explore whether the age of victim (child vs. nonchild) and nature of sexual offense (penetrative vs. nonpenetrative) influenced the youth's engagement in offense pathways. The results suggest that pleasure, relatedness, and inner peace were the primary human goods that were most sought after by a sample of 168 youth who sexually offended in Singapore. In addition, offender classification (in relation to the age of victim and nature of sexual offense) influenced the pathways to sexual offending. Therefore, these findings have important clinical implications for assessment, management, and intervention planning for youth who sexually offended.

References
1.
Fanniff A, Kolko D . Victim age-based subtypes of juveniles adjudicated for sexual offenses: comparisons across domains in an outpatient sample. Sex Abuse. 2011; 24(3):224-64. DOI: 10.1177/1079063211416516. View

2.
Aebi M, Vogt G, Plattner B, Steinhausen H, Bessler C . Offender types and criminality dimensions in male juveniles convicted of sexual offenses. Sex Abuse. 2011; 24(3):265-88. DOI: 10.1177/1079063211420449. View

3.
Bhugra D, Popelyuk D, McMullen I . Paraphilias across cultures: contexts and controversies. J Sex Res. 2010; 47(2):242-56. DOI: 10.1080/00224491003699833. View

4.
Eaton D, Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin S, Ross J, Hawkins J . Youth risk behavior surveillance--United States, 2007. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008; 57(4):1-131. View

5.
Chu C, Ng K, Fong J, Teoh J . Assessing youth who sexually offended: the predictive validity of the ERASOR, J-SOAP-II, and YLS/CMI in a non-Western context. Sex Abuse. 2011; 24(2):153-74. PMC: 4449365. DOI: 10.1177/1079063211404250. View