» Articles » PMID: 24043394

Clinical Comparison of Four Types of Skin Incisions for Skin-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Overview
Journal Surg Today
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2013 Sep 18
PMID 24043394
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) has become popular as an effective procedure for patients with early breast cancer. We herein report an overview of the four types of skin incisions used for SSM.

Methods: The records of 111 consecutive breast cancer patients, who received SSM and IBR from 2003 to 2012, were reviewed retrospectively. Four types of skin incisions were used. Type A was the so-called tennis racquet incision, type B was a periareolar incision and mid-axillary incision, type C was the so-called areola-sparing with mid-axillary incision and type D was a small transverse elliptical incision and transverse axillary incision.

Results: Twenty-six type A, 59 type B, 20 type C and six type D incisions were made. The average blood loss and average length of the operation during SSM were not significantly different between the four approaches. The average areolar diameter was 35 mm for type A, B and D incisions, and 45 mm for type C. There was a need for postoperative nipple-areolar complex plasty (NAC-P) in 75 % of the cases following type A, B and D incisions, and 35 % of the cases treated using type C incisions.

Conclusion: The type C incision is superior with regard to the cost and cosmetic outcomes, because fewer of these patients request postoperative NAC-P.

Citing Articles

Relationship between Ribosomal Protein S6-pS240 Expression and other Prognostic Factors in Non-Special Type Invasive Breast Cancer.

Cuperjani F, Gashi L, Kurshumliu F, Dreshaj S, Selimi F Breast Care (Basel). 2019; 14(3):171-175.

PMID: 31316316 PMC: 6600048. DOI: 10.1159/000491427.


Preservation of the nipple-areola complex in skin-sparing mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Miyake R, Kinoshita S, Shimada N, Uchida K, Takeyama H, Morikawa T Surg Today. 2018; 48(6):591-597.

PMID: 29468434 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1633-z.


Endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction versus breast conserving surgery: a long-term study.

Du J, Liang Q, Qi X, Ming J, Liu J, Zhong L Sci Rep. 2017; 7:45636.

PMID: 28361955 PMC: 5374499. DOI: 10.1038/srep45636.


Aesthetic design of skin-sparing mastectomy incisions for immediate autologous tissue breast reconstruction in asian women.

Tan B, Chim H, Ng Z, Ong K Arch Plast Surg. 2014; 41(4):366-73.

PMID: 25075359 PMC: 4113696. DOI: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.4.366.

References
1.
Kinoshita S, Nojima K, Takeishi M, Imawari Y, Kyoda S, Hirano A . Retrospective comparison of non-skin-sparing mastectomy and skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012; 2011:876520. PMC: 3263672. DOI: 10.1155/2011/876520. View

2.
. Results of questionnaires concerning breast cancer surgery in Japan: an update in 2000. Breast Cancer. 2002; 9(1):1. View

3.
Singletary S, Kroll S . Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Adv Surg. 1996; 30:39-52. View

4.
Fisher B, Fisher E . Barrier function of lymph node to tumor cells and erythrocytes. II. Effect of x-ray, inflammation, sensitization and tumor growth. Cancer. 1967; 20(11):1914-9. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(196711)20:11<1914::aid-cncr2820201118>3.0.co;2-q. View

5.
Fisher B . From Halsted to prevention and beyond: advances in the management of breast cancer during the twentieth century. Eur J Cancer. 2000; 35(14):1963-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00217-8. View