» Articles » PMID: 24041037

Applications of Technology in Neuropsychological Assessment

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2013 Sep 18
PMID 24041037
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most neuropsychological assessments include at least one measure that is administered, scored, or interpreted by computers or other technologies. Despite supportive findings for these technology-based assessments, there is resistance in the field of neuropsychology to adopt additional measures that incorporate technology components. This literature review addresses the research findings of technology-based neuropsychological assessments, including computer- and virtual reality-based measures of cognitive and functional abilities. We evaluate the strengths and limitations of each approach, and examine the utility of technology-based assessments to obtain supplemental cognitive and behavioral information that may be otherwise undetected by traditional paper-and-pencil measures. We argue that the potential of technology use in neuropsychological assessment has not yet been realized, and continued adoption of new technologies could result in more comprehensive assessment of cognitive dysfunction and in turn, better informed diagnosis and treatments. Recommendations for future research are also provided.

Citing Articles

Exploring How Older Adults Experience semAPP, a 360° Media-Based Tool for Memory Assessment: Qualitative Study.

Bruni F, Mancuso V, Panigada J, Stramba-Badiale M, Cipresso P, Pedroli E JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e56796.

PMID: 39637375 PMC: 11659691. DOI: 10.2196/56796.


An iterative approach for estimating domain-specific cognitive abilities from large scale online cognitive data.

Giunchiglia V, Gruia D, Lerede A, Trender W, Hellyer P, Hampshire A NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):328.

PMID: 39562825 PMC: 11576988. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01327-x.


Neurocognitive functioning during adolescence: Spanish validation of the Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery.

Fernandez-Garcia X, Inchausti F, Perez-Albeniz A, Ortuno-Sierra J, Falco R, Fonseca-Pedrero E Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024; 33(4):e2035.

PMID: 39432534 PMC: 11493150. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.2035.


Human reasoning on social interactions in ecological contexts: insights from the theory of mind brain circuits.

Isernia S, Pirastru A, Rossetto F, Cacciatore D, Cazzoli M, Blasi V Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1420122.

PMID: 39176386 PMC: 11339883. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1420122.


Feasibility and reliability of online vs in-person cognitive testing in healthy older people.

Morrissey S, Gillings R, Hornberger M PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309006.

PMID: 39163365 PMC: 11335153. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309006.


References
1.
Riva G . Applications of virtual environments in medicine. Methods Inf Med. 2003; 42(5):524-34. View

2.
Dwolatzky T, Whitehead V, Doniger G, Simon E, Schweiger A, Jaffe D . Validity of a novel computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatr. 2003; 3:4. PMC: 270050. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-3-4. View

3.
Hobson P, Meara J . The detection of dementia and cognitive impairment in a community population of elderly people with Parkinson's disease by use of the CAMCOG neuropsychological test. Age Ageing. 1999; 28(1):39-43. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/28.1.39. View

4.
Gau S, Shang C . Executive functions as endophenotypes in ADHD: evidence from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB). J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010; 51(7):838-49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02215.x. View

5.
Vincent A, Roebuck-Spencer T, Gilliland K, Schlegel R . Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (v4) Traumatic Brain Injury Battery: military normative data. Mil Med. 2012; 177(3):256-69. DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-11-00289. View