Lost in Translation: Assessing Effectiveness of Focus Group Questioning Techniques to Develop Improved Translation of Terminology Used in HIV Prevention Clinical Trials

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2013 Sep 17

PMID 24040075

Citations 4

Authors

Natasha Mack

Catalina B Ramirez

Barbara Friedland

Soori Nnko

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Achieving participant comprehension has proven to be one of the most difficult, practical, and ethical challenges of HIV prevention clinical trials. It becomes even more challenging when local languages do not have equivalent scientific and technical vocabularies, rendering communication of scientific concepts in translated documents extremely difficult. Even when bilingual lexicons are developed, there is no guarantee that participants understand the terminology as translated.

Methods: We conducted twelve focus groups with women of reproductive age in Mwanza, Tanzania to explore the effectiveness of four questioning techniques for: (1) assessing participants' familiarity with existing technical terms and concepts, (2) generating a list of acceptable technical and non-technical terms, (3) testing our definitions of technical terms, and (4) verifying participants' preferences for terms. Focus groups were transcribed, translated, and qualitatively analyzed.

Results And Discussion: A translation process that uses all four questioning techniques in a step-wise approach is an effective way to establish a baseline understanding of participants' familiarity with research terms, to develop and test translatable definitions, and to identify participants' preferred terminology for international HIV clinical research. This may help to ensure that important concepts are not "lost in translation." The results emphasize the importance of using a variety of techniques depending on the level of participant familiarity with research concepts, the existence of colloquial or technical terms in the target language, and the inherent complexity of the terms.

Citing Articles

Acceptability and effectiveness of a study information video in improving the research consent process for youth: a non-inferiority trial.

Mwaturura T, Simms V, Dauya E, Shrestha S, Ferrand S, Shavani T BMJ Glob Health. 2025; 10(1.

PMID: 39828429 PMC: 11749567. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014481.

Beyond translations, perspectives for researchers to consider to enhance comprehension during consent processes for health research in sub-saharan Africa: a scoping review.

Busisiwe N, Seeley J, Strode A, Parker M BMC Med Ethics. 2023; 24(1):43.

PMID: 37344810 PMC: 10286482. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00920-1.

Refining Interventions Through Formative Research: A Focus on Ethical Considerations in a Family-Based Home-Based Counseling and Testing (FBCT) Intervention in KwaZulu-Natal.

Essack Z, Ngcobo N, Van der Pol N, Knight L, Rochat T, Mkhize M J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019; 15(3):153-162.

PMID: 31691625 PMC: 7200267. DOI: 10.1177/1556264619885214.

Lost in Translation: Language, Terminology, and Understanding of Penile-Anal Intercourse in an HIV Prevention Trial in South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe.

Duby Z, Hartmann M, Mahaka I, Munaiwa O, Nabukeera J, Vilakazi N J Sex Res. 2015; 53(9):1096-1106.

PMID: 26566583 PMC: 4961617. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1069784.

Linguistic and Cultural Challenges in Communication and Translation in US-Sponsored HIV Prevention Research in Emerging Economies.

Hanrahan D, Sexton P, Hui K, Teitcher J, Sugarman J, London A PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0133394.

PMID: 26225759 PMC: 4520713. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133394.

References

Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, Agot K, Lombaard J, Kapiga S . Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(5):411-22. PMC: 3687217. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1202614. View

Marshall P . Informed consent in international health research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009; 1(1):25-42. DOI: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.25. View

Davis T, Holcombe R, Berkel H, Pramanik S, Divers S . Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90(9):668-74. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/90.9.668. View

Waggoner W, Mayo D . Who understands? A survey of 25 words or phrases commonly used in proposed clinical research consent forms. IRB. 1995; 17(1):6-9. View

Molyneux C, Peshu N, Marsh K . Understanding of informed consent in a low-income setting: three case studies from the Kenyan Coast. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59(12):2547-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.037. View

Bhutta Z . Beyond informed consent. Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 82(10):771-7. PMC: 2623030. View

Elbourne D, Snowdon C, Garcia J . Informed consent. Subjects may not understand concept of clinical trials. BMJ. 1997; 315(7102):248-9. PMC: 2127151. View

LoVerde M, Prochazka A, Byyny R . Research consent forms: continued unreadability and increasing length. J Gen Intern Med. 1989; 4(5):410-2. DOI: 10.1007/BF02599693. View

Maneesriwongul W, Dixon J . Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 48(2):175-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.x. View

10.

Woodsong C, Abdool Karim Q . A model designed to enhance informed consent: experiences from the HIV prevention trials network. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95(3):412-9. PMC: 1449193. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.041624. View

11.

Ridpath J, Wiese C, Greene S . Looking at research consent forms through a participant-centered lens: the PRISM readability toolkit. Am J Health Promot. 2009; 23(6):371-5. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.080613-CIT-94. View

12.

Penn C, Evans M . Recommendations for communication to enhance informed consent and enrolment at multilingual research sites. Afr J AIDS Res. 2015; 8(3):285-94. DOI: 10.2989/AJAR.2009.8.3.5.926. View

13.

Meade C, Howser D . Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992; 19(10):1523-8. View

14.

Tekola F, Bull S, Farsides B, Newport M, Adeyemo A, Rotimi C . Tailoring consent to context: designing an appropriate consent process for a biomedical study in a low income setting. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009; 3(7):e482. PMC: 2705797. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000482. View

15.

Lawson S, Adamson H . Informed consent readability: subject understanding of 15 common consent form phrases. IRB. 1995; 17(5-6):16-9. View

16.

Skoler-Karpoff S, Ramjee G, Ahmed K, Altini L, Plagianos M, Friedland B . Efficacy of Carraguard for prevention of HIV infection in women in South Africa: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 372(9654):1977-87. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61842-5. View

17.

Jones P, Lee J, Phillips L, Zhang X, Jaceldo K . An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research. Nurs Res. 2001; 50(5):300-4. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-200109000-00008. View

18.

Jhanwar V, Bishnoi R . Comprehensibility of translated informed consent documents used in clinical research in psychiatry. Indian J Psychol Med. 2011; 32(1):7-12. PMC: 3137819. DOI: 10.4103/0253-7176.70517. View

19.

Krosin M, Klitzman R, Levin B, Cheng J, Ranney M . Problems in comprehension of informed consent in rural and peri-urban Mali, West Africa. Clin Trials. 2006; 3(3):306-13. DOI: 10.1191/1740774506cn150oa. View

20.

Weeks A, Swerissen H, Belfrage J . Issues, challenges, and solutions in translating study instruments. Eval Rev. 2007; 31(2):153-65. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X06294184. View