» Articles » PMID: 24036961

Reward Sensitivity to Faces Versus Objects in Children: an ERP Study

Overview
Date 2013 Sep 17
PMID 24036961
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

How children respond to social and nonsocial rewards has important implications for understanding social cognitive development. Adults find faces intrinsically rewarding. However, little is known about how children respond to face vs nonface rewards. We utilized event-related potentials (the stimulus-preceding negativity, SPN) to measure differences in reward anticipation during a guessing game in 6- to 8-year-olds. Children were presented with reward indicators accompanied by incidental face or nonface stimuli. Nonface stimuli were comprised of scrambled faces in the shape of arrows, controlling for low-level properties of the two conditions. Children showed an increased SPN when the reward stimuli were accompanied by faces, relative to nonface stimuli. This suggests that children find a face stimulus more rewarding than a nonface stimulus. The results have important implications for processing social vs nonsocial rewards in typically developing children, and allow testing of populations with deficits in social reward processing, such as autism spectrum disorder.

Citing Articles

A network approach to the investigation of childhood irritability: probing frustration using social stimuli.

Thompson K, Schneider C, Lopez-Roque J, Wakschlag L, Karim H, Perlman S J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023; 65(7):959-972.

PMID: 38124618 PMC: 11161318. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13937.


The influence of reward anticipation on conflict control in children and adolescents: Evidences from hierarchical drift-diffusion model and event-related potentials.

Liu T, Wang D, Wang C, Xiao T, Shi J Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2022; 55:101118.

PMID: 35653919 PMC: 9163699. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101118.


Investigating Changes in Reward-Related Neural Correlates After PEERS Intervention in Adolescents With ASD: Preliminary Evidence of a "Precision Medicine" Approach.

Baker E, Veytsman E, Choy T, Blacher J, Stavropoulos K Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:742280.

PMID: 34803765 PMC: 8595219. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.742280.


The implicit reward value of the owner's face for dogs.

Bollo H, Kiss O, Kis A, Topal J iScience. 2021; 24(8):102763.

PMID: 34401657 PMC: 8355952. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102763.


Differential Effects of Monetary and Social Rewards on Product Online Rating Decisions in E-Commerce in China.

Wang C, Fu W, Jin J, Shang Q, Luo X, Zhang X Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1440.

PMID: 32733323 PMC: 7362955. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01440.


References
1.
Chatterjee A, Thomas A, Smith S, Aguirre G . The neural response to facial attractiveness. Neuropsychology. 2009; 23(2):135-43. DOI: 10.1037/a0014430. View

2.
Damen E, Brunia C . Changes in heart rate and slow brain potentials related to motor preparation and stimulus anticipation in a time estimation task. Psychophysiology. 1987; 24(6):700-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00353.x. View

3.
Dichter G, Richey J, Rittenberg A, Sabatino A, Bodfish J . Reward circuitry function in autism during face anticipation and outcomes. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011; 42(2):147-60. PMC: 8624275. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-011-1221-1. View

4.
Gaspar P, Berger B, Febvret A, Vigny A, Henry J . Catecholamine innervation of the human cerebral cortex as revealed by comparative immunohistochemistry of tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine-beta-hydroxylase. J Comp Neurol. 1989; 279(2):249-71. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902790208. View

5.
Kampe K, Frith C, Dolan R, Frith U . Reward value of attractiveness and gaze. Nature. 2001; 413(6856):589. DOI: 10.1038/35098149. View