» Articles » PMID: 24027604

Organizational Structure Reduces Processing Load in the Prefrontal Cortex During Discourse Processing of Written Text: Implications for High-Level Reading Issues After TBI

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) can demonstrate marked difficulty producing discourse during story retell and story generation tasks. Changes in discourse production have been detailed in terms of fewer content units and infrequent use of story grammar elements essential for organization. One implication is that poor use of story grammar elements during discourse production may signal reduced ability to utilize these elements in other communication realms (e.g., reading comprehension). The neural architecture that supports discourse organization, primarily the medial prefrontal cortex, is particularly susceptible to damage secondary to acquired brain injury. In this event related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we describe cortical activation patterns of unimpaired readers as they are presented with discourse that is varied in terms of structural organization. The results suggest reading discourse with less structure is associated with increased cortical activity (e.g., higher processing demands) as compared to reading discourse with more traditional structural cues (e.g., story grammar). We discuss cortical areas implicated and potential implications for supporting discourse communication in persons following TBI.

Citing Articles

Deficits in narrative discourse elicited by visual stimuli are already present in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Drummond C, Coutinho G, Fonseca R, Assuncao N, Teldeschi A, de Oliveira-Souza R Front Aging Neurosci. 2015; 7:96.

PMID: 26074814 PMC: 4446997. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00096.


Analysis of narrative discourse structure as an ecologically relevant measure of executive function in adults.

Cannizzaro M, Coelho C J Psycholinguist Res. 2012; 42(6):527-49.

PMID: 23192423 DOI: 10.1007/s10936-012-9231-5.

References
1.
Ferstl E, Neumann J, Bogler C, von Cramon D . The extended language network: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007; 29(5):581-93. PMC: 2878642. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20422. View

2.
Stemmer B . Discourse studies in neurologically impaired populations: a quest for action. Brain Lang. 1999; 68(3):402-18. DOI: 10.1006/brln.1999.2120. View

3.
Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J . Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: a follow-up study. Brain Inj. 1998; 12(11):911-35. DOI: 10.1080/026990598121981. View

4.
Schneider P, Winship S . Adults' judgments of fictional story quality. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002; 45(2):372-83. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/029). View

5.
Krueger F, Moll J, Zahn R, Heinecke A, Grafman J . Event frequency modulates the processing of daily life activities in human medial prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2006; 17(10):2346-53. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl143. View