Branch Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Does Cyst Size Change the Tip of the Scale? A Critical Analysis of the Revised International Consensus Guidelines in a Large Single-institutional Series
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: The aim of this study was to critically analyze the safety of the revised guidelines, with focus on cyst size and worrisome features in the management of BD-IPMN.
Background: The Sendai guidelines for management of branch duct (BD) intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) espouse safety of observation of asymptomatic cysts smaller than 3 cm without nodules (Sendai negative). Revised international consensus guidelines published in 2012 suggest a still more conservative approach, even for lesions of 3 cm or larger. By contrast, 2 recent studies have challenged the safety of both guidelines, describing invasive carcinoma or carcinoma in situ in 67% of BD-IPMN smaller than 3 cm and in 25% of "Sendai-negative" BD-IPMN.
Methods And Results: Review of a prospective database identified 563 patients with BD-IPMN. A total of 240 patients underwent surgical resection (152 at the time of diagnosis and 88 after being initially followed); the remaining 323 have been managed by observation with median follow-up of 60 months. No patient developed unresectable BD-IPMN carcinoma during follow-up. Invasive cancer arising in BD-IPMN was found in 23 patients of the entire cohort (4%), and an additional 21 patients (3.7%) had or developed concurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. According to the revised guidelines, 76% of resected BD-IPMN with carcinoma in situ and 95% of resected BD-IPMN with invasive cancer had high-risk stigmata or worrisome features. The risk of high-grade dysplasia in nonworrisome lesions smaller than 3 cm was 6.5%, but when the threshold was raised to greater than 3 cm, it was 8.8%, and 1 case of invasive carcinoma was found.
Conclusions: Expectant management of BD-IPMN following the old guidelines is safe, whereas caution is advised for larger lesions, even in the absence of worrisome features.
Advances for Managing Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Integrating Imaging and AI Innovations.
Seyithanoglu D, Durak G, Keles E, Medetalibeyoglu A, Hong Z, Zhang Z Cancers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.
PMID: 39766167 PMC: 11674829. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244268.
Novel Insights into Postoperative Surveillance in Resected Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms-A Review.
Balaban D, Coman L, Balaban M, Costache R, Jinga M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(10).
PMID: 38786354 PMC: 11119521. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101056.
Beger H, Mayer B, Poch B Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(7):4637-4653.
PMID: 38578553 PMC: 11164799. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15222-y.
Salahuddin A, Thayaparan V, Hamad A, Tarver W, Cloyd J, Kim A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(3).
PMID: 38337524 PMC: 10856514. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030830.
Ciprani D, Frampton A, Amar H, Oppong K, Pandanaboyana S, Aroori S Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(12):9043-9051.
PMID: 37907657 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10518-8.