Feature-based Attention: It is All Bottom-up Priming

Overview

Journal Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci

Specialty Biology

Date 2013 Sep 11

PMID 24018717

Citations 52

Authors

Jan Theeuwes

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Feature-based attention (FBA) enhances the representation of image characteristics throughout the visual field, a mechanism that is particularly useful when searching for a specific stimulus feature. Even though most theories of visual search implicitly or explicitly assume that FBA is under top-down control, we argue that the role of top-down processing in FBA may be limited. Our review of the literature indicates that all behavioural and neuro-imaging studies investigating FBA suffer from the shortcoming that they cannot rule out an effect of priming. The mere attending to a feature enhances the mandatory processing of that feature across the visual field, an effect that is likely to occur in an automatic, bottom-up way. Studies that have investigated the feasibility of FBA by means of cueing paradigms suggest that the role of top-down processing in FBA is limited (e.g. prepare for red). Instead, the actual processing of the stimulus is needed to cause the mandatory tuning of responses throughout the visual field. We conclude that it is likely that all FBA effects reported previously are the result of bottom-up priming.

Citing Articles

Pre-stimulus activities affect subsequent visual processing: Empirical evidence and potential neural mechanisms.

Dehaghani N, Zarei M Brain Behav. 2025; 15(2):e3654.

PMID: 39907172 PMC: 11795279. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3654.

Words before pictures: the role of language in biasing visual attention.

Calignano G, Lorenzoni A, Semeraro G, Navarrete E Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1439397.

PMID: 39744025 PMC: 11688633. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1439397.

Conditional independence as a statistical assessment of evidence integration processes.

Salinas E, Stanford T PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0297792.

PMID: 38722936 PMC: 11081312. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297792.

Adapting attentional control settings in a shape-changing environment.

Mu Y, Schubo A, Tunnermann J Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(2):404-421.

PMID: 38169028 PMC: 10805924. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02818-x.

Conditional independence as a statistical assessment of evidence integration processes.

Salinas E, Stanford T bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37646001 PMC: 10461915. DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.03.539321.

References

Tsal Y, Lamy D . Attending to an object's color entails attending to its location: support for location-special views of visual attention. Percept Psychophys. 2000; 62(5):960-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03212081. View

Folk C, Remington R, Johnston J . Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992; 18(4):1030-44. View

Belopolsky A, Schreij D, Theeuwes J . What is top-down about contingent capture?. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010; 72(2):326-41. DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.2.326. View

VON WRIGHT J . On selection in visual immediate memory. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1970; 33:280-92. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90140-x. View

Wolfe J . Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 1(2):202-38. DOI: 10.3758/BF03200774. View

Saenz M, Buracas G, Boynton G . Global feature-based attention for motion and color. Vision Res. 2003; 43(6):629-37. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00595-3. View

Maljkovic V, Nakayama K . Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Mem Cognit. 1994; 22(6):657-72. DOI: 10.3758/bf03209251. View

Muller H, Reimann B, Krummenacher J . Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003; 29(5):1021-35. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1021. View

Theeuwes J . Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Percept Psychophys. 1991; 50(2):184-93. DOI: 10.3758/bf03212219. View

10.

Kristjansson A, Wang D, Nakayama K . The role of priming in conjunctive visual search. Cognition. 2002; 85(1):37-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00074-4. View

11.

Maunsell J, Treue S . Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends Neurosci. 2006; 29(6):317-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.04.001. View

12.

OCraven K, Downing P, Kanwisher N . fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature. 1999; 401(6753):584-7. DOI: 10.1038/44134. View

13.

Theeuwes J, Van der Burg E . The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007; 33(6):1335-51. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1335. View

14.

Serences J, Boynton G . Feature-based attentional modulations in the absence of direct visual stimulation. Neuron. 2007; 55(2):301-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.015. View

15.

Schreij D, Theeuwes J, Olivers C . Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: additivity is no evidence for filtering. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010; 72(3):672-82. DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.3.672. View

16.

Chawla D, Rees G, Friston K . The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(7):671-6. DOI: 10.1038/10230. View

17.

Bacon W, Egeth H . Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Percept Psychophys. 1994; 55(5):485-96. DOI: 10.3758/bf03205306. View

18.

Shih S, Sperling G . Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996; 22(3):758-79. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.3.758. View

19.

Vierck E, Miller J . Direct selection by color for visual encoding. Percept Psychophys. 2005; 67(3):483-94. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193326. View

20.

Pinto Y, Olivers C, Theeuwes J . Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: intertrial priming does. Percept Psychophys. 2006; 67(8):1354-61. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193640. View