» Articles » PMID: 24015239

Fluid Dynamics of Coarctation of the Aorta and Effect of Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Sep 10
PMID 24015239
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Up to 80% of patients with coarctation of the aorta (COA) have a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Patients with COA and BAV have elevated risks of aortic complications despite successful surgical repair. The development of such complications involves the interplay between the mechanical forces applied on the artery and the biological processes occurring at the cellular level. The focus of this study is on hemodynamic modifications induced in the aorta in the presence of a COA and a BAV. For this purpose, numerical investigations and magnetic resonance imaging measurements were conducted with different configurations: (1) normal: normal aorta and normal aortic valve; (2) isolated COA: aorta with COA (75% reduction by area) and normal aortic valve; (3) complex COA: aorta with the same severity of COA (75% reduction by area) and BAV. The results show that the coexistence of COA and BAV significantly alters blood flow in the aorta with a significant increase in the maximal velocity, secondary flow, pressure loss, time-averaged wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index downstream of the COA. These findings can contribute to a better understanding of why patients with complex COA have adverse outcome even following a successful surgery.

Citing Articles

The global effect of aortic coarctation on carotid and renal pulsatile hemodynamics.

Rafiei D, Pahlevan N PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0310793.

PMID: 39689111 PMC: 11651599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310793.


Multiscale structure and function of the aortic valve apparatus.

El-Nashar H, Sabry M, Tseng Y, Francis N, Latif N, Parker K Physiol Rev. 2023; 104(4):1487-1532.

PMID: 37732828 PMC: 11495199. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00038.2022.


Impact of TAVR on coronary artery hemodynamics using clinical measurements and image-based patient-specific in silico modeling.

Garber L, Khodaei S, Maftoon N, Keshavarz-Motamed Z Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):8948.

PMID: 37268642 PMC: 10238523. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31987-w.


Left Main Stenosis Stenting Normalises Wall Shear Stress of Ascending Aorta in Bicuspid Aortic Valve.

Rigatelli G, Zuin M Heart Int. 2022; 14(2):121-122.

PMID: 36276514 PMC: 9524745. DOI: 10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.121.


Isolating the Effect of Arch Architecture on Aortic Hemodynamics Late After Coarctation Repair: A Computational Study.

Goodarzi Ardakani V, Goordoyal H, Ordonez M, Sophocleous F, Curtis S, Bedair R Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:855118.

PMID: 35811705 PMC: 9263195. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.855118.


References
1.
Secchi F, Iozzelli A, Papini G, Aliprandi A, Di Leo G, Sardanelli F . MR imaging of aortic coarctation. Radiol Med. 2009; 114(4):524-37. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-009-0386-6. View

2.
Watton P, Hill N, Heil M . A mathematical model for the growth of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2004; 3(2):98-113. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-004-0052-9. View

3.
von Kodolitsch Y, Aydin M, Koschyk D, Loose R, Schalwat I, Karck M . Predictors of aneurysmal formation after surgical correction of aortic coarctation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39(4):617-24. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01784-3. View

4.
LaDisa Jr J, Figueroa C, Vignon-Clementel I, Kim H, Xiao N, Ellwein L . Computational simulations for aortic coarctation: representative results from a sampling of patients. J Biomech Eng. 2011; 133(9):091008. PMC: 3705983. DOI: 10.1115/1.4004996. View

5.
Saikrishnan N, Yap C, Milligan N, Vasilyev N, Yoganathan A . In vitro characterization of bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics using particle image velocimetry. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012; 40(8):1760-75. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0527-2. View