» Articles » PMID: 24008757

Second Line Use of Fingolimod is As Effective As Natalizumab in a German Out-patient RRMS-cohort

Overview
Journal J Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Sep 7
PMID 24008757
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although Fingolimod is registered as a second-line drug in relapsing-remittend multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Europe there are no clinical studies available comparing Fingolimod (FTY) and Natalizumab (N). This observational cohort-study used health data routinely collected in outpatient neurology practices throughout Germany completing a treatment period of 12 months included 237 patients starting on N and 190 patients on FTY because of failure of the first-line treatment. Mean relapse rate drastically decreased in both treatment groups within three months of therapy in a similar degree and remained on a low level. Both treatment groups saw a similar proportion of patients with unchanged and improved EDSS (80.53 % in FTY, 79.32 % in N). There was no statistically significant difference between the proportion of patients being relapse free (75.79 % in FTY, 71.73 % in N), progression free (87.39 % in FTY, 82.70 % in N) or relapse and progression free (71.05 % in FTY, 62.03 % in N) at 12 months in both strata. Clinical efficacy of FTY and N in RRMS second-line-therapy was similar during the first 12 months of treatment.

Citing Articles

Natalizumab versus fingolimod for patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from REVEAL, a prospective, randomised head-to-head study.

Butzkueven H, Licata S, Jeffery D, Arnold D, Filippi M, Geurts J BMJ Open. 2020; 10(10):e038861.

PMID: 33082194 PMC: 7577060. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038861.


Effectiveness of Fingolimod versus Natalizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Spain: Second-Line GATE Study.

Meca-Lallana J, Ayuso T, Martinez-Yelamos S, Duran C, Contreras Martin Y, Herrera Navarro N Eur Neurol. 2020; 83(1):25-33.

PMID: 32187609 PMC: 7265769. DOI: 10.1159/000505778.


The efficacy and safety of fingolimod in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis.

Yang T, Tian X, Chen C, Ma L, Zhou S, Li M Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019; 86(4):637-645.

PMID: 31869429 PMC: 7098866. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14198.


Natalizumab versus fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment.

Vollmer B, Nair K, Sillau S, Corboy J, Vollmer T, Alvarez E Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019; 6(2):252-262.

PMID: 30847358 PMC: 6389745. DOI: 10.1002/acn3.700.


NEDA-3 status including cortical lesions in the comparative evaluation of natalizumab fingolimod efficacy in multiple sclerosis.

Puthenparampil M, Cazzola C, Zywicki S, Federle L, Stropparo E, Anglani M Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018; 11:1756286418805713.

PMID: 30386435 PMC: 6204617. DOI: 10.1177/1756286418805713.


References
1.
Rudick R, Stuart W, Calabresi P, Confavreux C, Galetta S, Radue E . Natalizumab plus interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(9):911-23. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa044396. View

2.
Senn S, Graf E, Caputo A . Stratification for the propensity score compared with linear regression techniques to assess the effect of treatment or exposure. Stat Med. 2007; 26(30):5529-44. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3133. View

3.
Cohen J, Barkhof F, Comi G, Hartung H, Khatri B, Montalban X . Oral fingolimod or intramuscular interferon for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(5):402-15. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907839. View

4.
Polman C, OConnor P, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Miller D . A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(9):899-910. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa044397. View

5.
Kappos L, Radue E, OConnor P, Polman C, Hohlfeld R, Calabresi P . A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(5):387-401. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909494. View