» Articles » PMID: 24008749

Use of Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor-only Regimens in HIV-infected Children and Adolescents

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2013 Sep 7
PMID 24008749
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In adults, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-only antiretroviral regimens (NOARs) with ≥3 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are less potent than highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Published pediatric experience with NOARs is limited; thus, we wished to better define the virological, immunological and toxicological effects of NOARs in children and adolescents.

Methods: We analyzed data from NOAR-treated participants in LEGACY, a multicenter observational cohort study of HIV-infected children and adolescents. NOAR-treated case-participants were matched to participants without prior NOAR who initiated HAART during the same year for comparison.

Results: Of 575 participants with data from time of HIV diagnosis through 2006, 67 (12%) received NOARs for at least 24 weeks; most (46%) received the fixed dose combination of zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir. NOAR use peaked in 2001 to 2002. NOAR-treated participants were significantly older and more treatment experienced than HAART-treated participants. Virologic outcomes, including the percentage of participants with a plasma HIV RNA viral load <400 copies/mL at week 24 (47% versus 34%) and the mean 24-week change in log10 plasma HIV RNA viral load from baseline (-0.63 versus -1.02), were similar between NOAR- and HAART-treated participants, but virologic rebound was more likely in NOAR-treated participants (77% versus 54%, P = 0.02). Increase in CD4 percentage points from baseline to 24 weeks was negligible in NOAR-treated participants compared with HAART-treated participants (0.95% versus 10.1%, P < 0.001). Anemia and leukopenia were more commonly reported with NOARs than HAART.

Discussion: Week 24 virologic outcomes were similar between NOAR- and HAART-treated participants, but NOAR durability was poorer and their use was associated with less immunologic reconstitution. NOARs should play a limited role in pediatric and adolescent antiretroviral therapy.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of abacavir-containing combination antiretroviral therapy as first-line treatment of HIV infected children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adetokunboh O, Schoonees A, Balogun T, Wiysonge C BMC Infect Dis. 2015; 15:469.

PMID: 26502899 PMC: 4623925. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1183-6.

References
1.
Landman R, Descamps D, Peytavin G, Trylesinski A, Katlama C, Girard P . Early virologic failure and rescue therapy of tenofovir, abacavir, and lamivudine for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: TONUS study. HIV Clin Trials. 2006; 6(6):291-301. DOI: 10.1310/9DQP-R7JA-75ED-RBCP. View

2.
Garvie P, Flynn P, Belzer M, Britto P, Hu C, Graham B . Psychological factors, beliefs about medication, and adherence of youth with human immunodeficiency virus in a multisite directly observed therapy pilot study. J Adolesc Health. 2011; 48(6):637-40. PMC: 3096841. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.09.014. View

3.
Shafer R . Rationale and uses of a public HIV drug-resistance database. J Infect Dis. 2006; 194 Suppl 1:S51-8. PMC: 2614864. DOI: 10.1086/505356. View

4.
Barth R, Schim van der Loeff M, Schuurman R, Hoepelman A, Wensing A . Virological follow-up of adult patients in antiretroviral treatment programmes in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010; 10(3):155-66. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70328-7. View

5.
Ding H, Wilson C, Modjarrad K, McGwin Jr G, Tang J, Vermund S . Predictors of suboptimal virologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy among human immunodeficiency virus-infected adolescents: analyses of the reaching for excellence in adolescent care and health (REACH) project. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163(12):1100-5. PMC: 3739292. DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.204. View