» Articles » PMID: 24007642

Concordance of Macular Pigment Measurements Obtained Using Customized Heterochromatic Flicker Photometry, Dual-wavelength Autofluorescence, and Single-wavelength Reflectance

Overview
Journal Exp Eye Res
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2013 Sep 7
PMID 24007642
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study compares in vivo measurements of macular pigment (MP) obtained using customized heterochromatic flicker photometry (cHFP; Macular Metrics Densitometer(™)), dual-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (Heidelberg Spectralis(®) HRA + OCT MultiColor) and single-wavelength fundus reflectance (Zeiss Visucam(®) 200). MP was measured in one eye of 62 subjects on each device. Data from 49 subjects (79%) was suitable for analysis. Agreement between the Densitometer and Spectralis was investigated at various eccentricities using a variety of quantitative and graphical methods, including: Pearson correlation coefficient to measure degree of scatter (precision), accuracy coefficient, concordance correlation coefficient (ccc), paired t-test, scatter and Bland-Altman plots. The relationship between max MP from the Visucam and central MP from the Spectralis and Densitometer was investigated using regression methods. Agreement was strong between the Densitometer and Spectralis at all central eccentricities (e.g. at 0.25° eccentricity: accuracy = 0.97, precision = 0.90, ccc = 0.87). Regression analysis showed a very weak relationship between the Visucam and Densitometer (e.g. Visucam max on Densitometer central MP: R(2) = 0.008, p = 0.843). Regression analysis also demonstrated a weak relationship between MP measured by the Spectralis and Visucam (e.g. Visucam max on Spectralis central MP: R(2) = 0.047, p = 0.348). MP values obtained using the Heidelberg Spectralis are comparable to MP values obtained using the Densitometer. In contrast, MP values obtained using the Zeiss Visucam are not comparable with either the Densitometer or the Spectralis MP measuring devices. Taking cHFP as the current standard to which other MP measuring devices should be compared, the Spectralis is suitable for use in a clinical and research setting, whereas the Visucam is not.

Citing Articles

In Vivo Correlation Between Macular Pigment Optical Volume and Retinal Layers Thickness.

Cozzi M, Casaluci M, Ruggi G, Airaldi M, Romano F, Bertoni A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(8):23.

PMID: 39007849 PMC: 467106. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.8.23.


Macular Pigment Assessment in Indian Population Using Degree of Polarization Threshold: Impact of Diet on Macular Pigment Density.

Sangani P, Temple S, Bhandary S, Narayanan R, Johnson E, Das A Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(3):20.

PMID: 38517446 PMC: 10981160. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.3.20.


Deep learning-based correction of cataract-induced influence on macular pigment optical density measurement by autofluorescence spectroscopy.

Obana A, Ote K, Gohto Y, Yamada H, Hashimoto F, Okazaki S PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0298132.

PMID: 38349916 PMC: 10863874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298132.


Measuring macular pigment optical density using reflective images of confocal scanning laser system.

Morita H, Matsushita I, Fujino Y, Obana A, Kondo H Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2023; 68(1):19-25.

PMID: 37966565 DOI: 10.1007/s10384-023-01031-5.


Macular pigment optical density of hyperopic anisometropic amblyopic patients measured by fundus reflectometry.

Wang C, Yu J, Pan M, Ye X, Song E Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:991423.

PMID: 36304187 PMC: 9592689. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.991423.