» Articles » PMID: 24007450

Safeguarding the Process of Drug Administration with an Emphasis on Electronic Support Tools

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2013 Sep 7
PMID 24007450
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The aim of this work is to understand the process of drug administration and identify points in the workflow that resulted in interventions by clinical information systems in order to improve patient safety.

Methods: To identify a generic way to structure the drug administration process we performed peer-group discussions and supplemented these discussions with a literature search for studies reporting errors in drug administration and strategies for their prevention.

Results: We concluded that the drug administration process might consist of up to 11 sub-steps, which can be grouped into the four sub-processes of preparation, personalization, application and follow-up. Errors in drug handling and administration are diverse and frequent and in many cases not caused by the patient him/herself, but by family members or nurses. Accordingly, different prevention strategies have been set in place with relatively few approaches involving e-health technology.

Conclusions: A generic structuring of the administration process and particular error-prone sub-steps may facilitate the allocation of prevention strategies and help to identify research gaps.

Citing Articles

Chitosan Nanoparticles as Oral Drug Carriers.

Guadarrama-Escobar O, Serrano-Castaneda P, Anguiano-Almazan E, Vazquez-Duran A, Pena-Juarez M, Vera-Graziano R Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(5).

PMID: 36901719 PMC: 10001540. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054289.


Oral bioavailability of microdoses and therapeutic doses of midazolam as a 2-dimensionally printed orodispersible film in healthy volunteers.

Breithaupt M, Krohmer E, Taylor L, Koerner E, Hoppe-Tichy T, Burhenne J Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 78(12):1965-1972.

PMID: 36258053 PMC: 9649511. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03406-y.


Development and Pilot-Testing of Key Questions to Identify Patients' Difficulties in Medication Administration.

Wurmbach V, Schmidt S, Lampert A, Bernard S, Faller C, Thurmann P Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021; 15:2479-2488.

PMID: 34785891 PMC: 8579958. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S328380.


Association Between Workarounds and Medication Administration Errors in Bar Code-Assisted Medication Administration: Protocol of a Multicenter Study.

van der Veen W, van den Bemt P, Bijlsma M, de Gier H, Taxis K JMIR Res Protoc. 2017; 6(4):e74.

PMID: 28455275 PMC: 5429431. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.7060.

References
1.
Kaushal R, Goldmann D, Keohane C, Christino M, Honour M, Hale A . Adverse drug events in pediatric outpatients. Ambul Pediatr. 2007; 7(5):383-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ambp.2007.05.005. View

2.
Adams D, Elliott T . Impact of safety needle devices on occupationally acquired needlestick injuries: a four-year prospective study. J Hosp Infect. 2006; 64(1):50-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.04.012. View

3.
Borel J, Rascati K . Effect of an automated, nursing unit-based drug-dispensing device on medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1995; 52(17):1875-9. DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/52.17.1875. View

4.
Peacock G, Parnapy S, Raynor S, Wetmore S . Accuracy and precision of manufacturer-supplied liquid medication administration devices before and after patient education. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2010; 50(1):84-6. DOI: 10.1331/JAPhA.2010.09006. View

5.
Kirkevold O, Engedal K . What is the matter with crushing pills and opening capsules?. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010; 16(1):81-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2009.01814.x. View