» Articles » PMID: 24006872

Identification of Upstream Regulators for Prognostic Expression Signature Genes in Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal BMC Syst Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2013 Sep 7
PMID 24006872
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Gene expression signatures have been commonly used as diagnostic and prognostic markers for cancer subtyping. However, expression signatures frequently include many passengers, which are not directly related to cancer progression. Their upstream regulators such as transcription factors (TFs) may take a more critical role as drivers or master regulators to provide better clues on the underlying regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic applications.

Results: In order to identify prognostic master regulators, we took the known 85 prognostic signature genes for colorectal cancer and inferred their upstream TFs. To this end, a global transcriptional regulatory network was constructed with total >200,000 TF-target links using the ARACNE algorithm. We selected the top 10 TFs as candidate master regulators to show the highest coverage of the signature genes among the total 846 TF-target sub-networks or regulons. The selected TFs showed a comparable or slightly better prognostic performance than the original 85 signature genes in spite of greatly reduced number of marker genes from 85 to 10. Notably, these TFs were selected solely from inferred regulatory links using gene expression profiles and included many TFs regulating tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, metastasis, and differentiation.

Conclusions: Our network approach leads to the identification of the upstream transcription factors for prognostic signature genes to provide leads to their regulatory mechanisms. We demonstrate that our approach could identify upstream biomarkers for a given set of signature genes with markedly smaller size and comparable performances. The utility of our method may be expandable to other types of signatures such as diagnosis and drug response.

Citing Articles

Gene Regulation Analysis Reveals Perturbations of Autism Spectrum Disorder during Neural System Development.

Li D, Xu J, Yang M Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(12).

PMID: 34946850 PMC: 8700980. DOI: 10.3390/genes12121901.


Mechanism-Centric Approaches for Biomarker Detection and Precision Therapeutics in Cancer.

Yu C, Mitrofanova A Front Genet. 2021; 12:687813.

PMID: 34408770 PMC: 8365516. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.687813.


Interplay of EMT and CSC in Cancer and the Potential Therapeutic Strategies.

Tanabe S, Quader S, Cabral H, Ono R Front Pharmacol. 2020; 11:904.

PMID: 32625096 PMC: 7311659. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00904.


Identification of Transcriptional Signatures of Colon Tumor Stroma by a Meta-Analysis.

Uddin M, Li M, Wang X J Oncol. 2019; 2019:8752862.

PMID: 31186640 PMC: 6521457. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8752862.


Identification of a Combined RNA Prognostic Signature in Adenocarcinoma of the Lung.

He S, Xi W, Wang X, Xu C, Cheng L, Liu S Med Sci Monit. 2019; 25:3941-3956.

PMID: 31132294 PMC: 6556069. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.913727.


References
1.
Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M . A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(27):2817-26. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041588. View

2.
Landrette S, Kuo Y, Hensen K, Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani S, Perrat P, Van de Ven W . Plag1 and Plagl2 are oncogenes that induce acute myeloid leukemia in cooperation with Cbfb-MYH11. Blood. 2004; 105(7):2900-7. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-09-3630. View

3.
Baba Y, Nosho K, Shima K, Irahara N, Chan A, Meyerhardt J . HIF1A overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in a cohort of 731 colorectal cancers. Am J Pathol. 2010; 176(5):2292-301. PMC: 2861094. DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090972. View

4.
J van t Veer L, Dai H, van de Vijver M, He Y, Hart A, Mao M . Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002; 415(6871):530-6. DOI: 10.1038/415530a. View

5.
Peer D, Hacohen N . Principles and strategies for developing network models in cancer. Cell. 2011; 144(6):864-73. PMC: 3082135. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.001. View