» Articles » PMID: 24004975

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for the Treatment of Medically Refractory Ascites

Overview
Date 2013 Sep 6
PMID 24004975
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study was performed to assess the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation for treatment of medically refractory ascites and to identify prognostic factors for clinical response, morbidity, and mortality.

Materials And Methods: In this retrospective study, 80 patients (male:female, 52:28; mean age, 56 years; mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] score, 15.1) who underwent elective TIPS creation for refractory ascites between 1999-2012 were studied. A medical record review was performed to identify data on demographics, liver disease, procedures, and outcome. The influence of these parameters on 30-day, 90-day, and one-year mortality was assessed using binary logistic regression. Overall survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier statistics.

Results: TIPS was successfully created using covered (n=70) or bare metal (n=10) stents. Hemodynamic success was achieved in all cases. The mean final portosystemic pressure gradient (PSG) was 6.8 mmHg. Thirty-day complications included mild encephalopathy in 35% of patients. Clinical improvement in ascites occurred in 78% of patients, with complete resolution or a ≥50% decrease in 66% of patients. No predictors of response or optimal PSG threshold were identified. The 30-day, 90-day, and one-year mortality rates were 14%, 23%, and 33%, respectively. Patient age (P = 0.026) was associated with 30-day mortality, while final PSG was associated with 90-day (P = 0.020) and one year (P = 0.032) mortality. No predictors of overall survival were identified.

Conclusion: TIPS creation effectively treats medically refractory ascites with nearly 80% efficacy. The incidence of mild encephalopathy is nontrivial. Older age and final PSG are associated with mortality, and these factors should be considered in patient selection and procedure performance.

Citing Articles

Optimal threshold of portal pressure gradient for patients with ascites after covered TIPS: a multicentre cohort study.

Xia Y, Tie J, Wang G, Wu H, Zhuge Y, Yuan X Hepatol Int. 2024; 19(1):199-211.

PMID: 39521751 PMC: 11846747. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-024-10742-x.


The Role of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for the Management of Ascites in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis.

Iannone G, Pompili E, De Venuto C, Pratelli D, Tedesco G, Baldassarre M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592162 PMC: 10932158. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051349.


Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: Devices Evolution, Technical Tips and Future Perspectives.

Saltini D, Indulti F, Guasconi T, Bianchini M, Cuffari B, Caporali C J Clin Med. 2023; 12(21).

PMID: 37959225 PMC: 10650044. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216758.


Change in Platelet Count after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation: An Advancing Liver Therapeutic Approaches (ALTA) Group Study.

Wong R, Ge J, Boike J, German M, Morelli G, Spengler E J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023; 34(8):1364-1371.

PMID: 37100199 PMC: 10998695. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.04.015.


Interventional recanalization therapy in patients with non-cirrhotic, non-malignant portal vein thrombosis: comparison between transjugular versus transhepatic access.

Mansour N, Ocal O, Gerwing M, Kohler M, Deniz S, Heinzow H Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022; 47(3):1177-1186.

PMID: 35020007 PMC: 8863683. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03411-w.


References
1.
Riggio O, Angeloni S, Salvatori F, De Santis A, Cerini F, Farcomeni A . Incidence, natural history, and risk factors of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103(11):2738-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02102.x. View

2.
Walser E, Harris V, Harman J, Park H, Siddiqui A . Quantification of intrahepatic portosystemic shunting after placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996; 7(2):263-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(96)70775-3. View

3.
Boyer T, Haskal Z . American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Guidelines: the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation in the management of portal hypertension. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005; 16(5):615-29. DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000157297.91510.21. View

4.
Heuman D, Abou-Assi S, Habib A, Williams L, Stravitz R, Sanyal A . Persistent ascites and low serum sodium identify patients with cirrhosis and low MELD scores who are at high risk for early death. Hepatology. 2004; 40(4):802-10. DOI: 10.1002/hep.20405. View

5.
Colombato L . The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of portal hypertension. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007; 41 Suppl 3:S344-51. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318157e500. View