» Articles » PMID: 23990960

Time Perception and Depressive Realism: Judgment Type, Psychophysical Functions and Bias

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Aug 31
PMID 23990960
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of mild depression on time estimation and production was investigated. Participants made both magnitude estimation and magnitude production judgments for five time intervals (specified in seconds) from 3 sec to 65 sec. The parameters of the best fitting psychophysical function (power law exponent, intercept, and threshold) were determined individually for each participant in every condition. There were no significant effects of mood (high BDI, low BDI) or judgment (estimation, production) on the mean exponent, n = .98, 95% confidence interval (.96-1.04) or on the threshold. However, the intercept showed a 'depressive realism' effect, where high BDI participants had a smaller deviation from accuracy and a smaller difference between estimation and judgment than low BDI participants. Accuracy bias was assessed using three measures of accuracy: difference, defined as psychological time minus physical time, ratio, defined as psychological time divided by physical time, and a new logarithmic accuracy measure defined as ln (ratio). The ln (ratio) measure was shown to have approximately normal residuals when subjected to a mixed ANOVA with mood as a between groups explanatory factor and judgment and time category as repeated measures explanatory factors. The residuals of the other two accuracy measures flagrantly violated normality. The mixed ANOVAs of accuracy also showed a strong depressive realism effect, just like the intercepts of the psychophysical functions. There was also a strong negative correlation between estimation and production judgments. Taken together these findings support a clock model of time estimation, combined with additional cognitive mechanisms to account for the depressive realism effect. The findings also suggest strong methodological recommendations.

Citing Articles

Commentary: "Physical time within human time" and "Bridging the neuroscience and physics of time".

Grondin S Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1063327.

PMID: 37842688 PMC: 10568481. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1063327.


Identifying the difference in time perception between major depressive disorder and bipolar depression through a temporal bisection task.

Liu P, Guo H, Ma R, Liu S, Wang X, Zhao K PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0277076.

PMID: 36469514 PMC: 9721479. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277076.


Time Production Intensively Studied in One Observer.

Glicksohn J, Weisinger B J Pers Oriented Res. 2022; 8(1):24-36.

PMID: 35859659 PMC: 9186124. DOI: 10.17505/jpor.2022.24219.


[Disturbances of time experience in mental disorders].

Juckel G, Steinfath H, Mavrogiorgou P Nervenarzt. 2021; 93(1):68-76.

PMID: 33403445 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-020-01047-z.


Slower perception of time in depressed and suicidal patients.

Caceda R, Carbajal J, Salomon R, Moore J, Perlman G, Padala P Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020; 40:4-16.

PMID: 33004229 PMC: 7655720. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.09.004.


References
1.
Wearden J, Edwards H, Fakhri M, Percival A . Why "sounds are judged longer than lights": application of a model of the internal clock in humans. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1998; 51(2):97-120. DOI: 10.1080/713932672. View

2.
Noulhiane M, Mella N, Samson S, Ragot R, Pouthas V . How emotional auditory stimuli modulate time perception. Emotion. 2007; 7(4):697-704. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.697. View

3.
Matthews W . Stimulus repetition and the perception of time: the effects of prior exposure on temporal discrimination, judgment, and production. PLoS One. 2011; 6(5):e19815. PMC: 3090413. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019815. View

4.
Zakay . Gating or switching? Gating is a better model of prospective timing (a response to 'switching or gating?' by Lejeune). Behav Processes. 2000; 50(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00086-3. View

5.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146. View