» Articles » PMID: 23989943

Surgical Strategies for Esophageal Cancer Associated with Head and Neck Cancer

Overview
Journal Surg Today
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2013 Aug 31
PMID 23989943
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Esophageal cancer is frequently associated with squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Both cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption are risk factors for multiple cancers of the head and neck, as well as the esophagus. Routine screening and close follow-up for second cancers are important in patients with esophageal cancer or head and neck cancer. For this purpose, endoscopy with Lugol's staining, as well as narrow-band imaging combined with magnifying endoscopy, is a powerful tool for the early detection of esophageal cancer. Multimodal therapy is essential for patients with double cancers. When considering surgical treatment, the curability of both cancers must be carefully evaluated. If both tumors are potentially curable, each lesion should be treated individually. In patients with metachronous double cancers, the prior treatment of the first primary carcinoma often affects the treatment of the second cancer. Close cooperation among medical staff members is essential for complicated surgeries for double cancers. Techniques that are appropriate for each case must be adopted, such as careful dissection, staged operations, muscular flaps and microvascular anastomosis.

Citing Articles

Impact of preceding treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on synchronous superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Ueda T, Ishihara R, Tani Y, Ando Y, Tanabe G, Fujimoto Y J Gastroenterol. 2024; .

PMID: 39661111 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-024-02201-z.


Risk factors of secondary cancer in laryngeal, oropharyngeal, or hypopharyngeal cancer after definitive therapy.

Nishimura G, Takahashi H, Sano D, Arai Y, Hatano T, Kitani Y Int J Clin Oncol. 2023; 29(2):103-114.

PMID: 38057500 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02433-8.


Preservation of remnant esophagus during total pharyngolaryngectomy in a patient with previous subtotal esophagectomy: a case report.

Oshikiri H, Okamoto H, Taniyama Y, Ishii R, Ohkoshi A, Kurosawa K Surg Case Rep. 2023; 9(1):42.

PMID: 36941470 PMC: 10027983. DOI: 10.1186/s40792-023-01624-9.


The Usability of Intensive Imaging Surveillance After Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H, Matsuda S, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Kitagawa Y Ann Surg Oncol. 2022; 30(4):2190-2197.

PMID: 36454376 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12739-y.


Overall Survival for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Multiple Primary Cancers after Curative Esophagectomy-A Retrospective Single-Institution Study.

Tsai P, Ting Y, Hsu P, Hung J, Huang C, Hsu W Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(21).

PMID: 36358682 PMC: 9658684. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215263.


References
1.
Katada C, Muto M, Nakayama M, Tanabe S, Higuchi K, Sasaki T . Risk of superficial squamous cell carcinoma developing in the head and neck region in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2012; 122(6):1291-6. DOI: 10.1002/lary.23249. View

2.
Wong S, Chan A, Lee D, To E, Ng E, Chung S . Minimal invasive approach of gastric and esophageal mobilization in total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy: total laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic technique. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17(5):798-802. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9117-y. View

3.
Rampazzo A, Salgado C, Gharb B, Mardini S, Spilimbergo S, Chen H . Donor-site morbidity after free ileocolon flap transfer for esophageal and voice reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122(6):186e-194e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818cc11e. View

4.
Watanabe M, Baba Y, Nagai Y, Baba H . Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review. Surg Today. 2012; 43(3):237-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-012-0300-z. View

5.
Hashimoto C, Iriya K, Baba E, Navarro-Rodriguez T, Zerbini M, Eisig J . Lugol's dye spray chromoendoscopy establishes early diagnosis of esophageal cancer in patients with primary head and neck cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100(2):275-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.30189.x. View