» Articles » PMID: 23982289

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Ultra-high-resolution Breast MRI at 7.0 Tesla

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Aug 29
PMID 23982289
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of 7-T contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious masses.

Methods: Twenty patients with 23 suspicious breast masses on conventional imaging (mean size 13 mm, range 5-27 mm) were examined at 7 T. The MRI protocol included a dynamic series with injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol (seven consecutive 3D T1-weighted gradient echo sequences, resolution 1 × 1 × 2 mm(3), temporal resolution 63 s) and ultra-high-resolution imaging (T1-weighted 3D gradient echo sequence, resolution 0.45 × 0.57 × 0.45 mm(3)). Two observers (R1 and R2) independently judged the examinations on image quality and classified lesions according to BI-RADS. The added value of ultra-high-resolution imaging was assessed.

Results: The image quality was deemed excellent in 1 and 0, good in 10 and 12, sufficient in 8 and 8, and insufficient in 1 and 0 for R1 and R2 respectively. Twenty of the 23 lesions were identified at 7-T MRI by both observers. All histopathologically proven malignant lesions (n = 19) were identified and classified as BI-RADS-MRI 4 or 5. Ultra-high-resolution imaging increased reader confidence in 88 % (R1) and 59 % (R2) of acquisitions.

Conclusion: The study shows the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced 7-T breast MRI, where all malignant mass lesions were identified by two observers.

Key Points: • Magnetic resonance imaging is important in the evaluation of breast cancer. • Recently, 7-T MRI has become available. • The 7-T dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI is feasible in patients. • The 7-T breast examinations are amenable to evaluation according to BI-RADS.

Citing Articles

7 Tesla and Beyond: Advanced Methods and Clinical Applications in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Platt T, Ladd M, Paech D Invest Radiol. 2021; 56(11):705-725.

PMID: 34510098 PMC: 8505159. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000820.


A 32-channel receive array coil for bilateral breast imaging and spectroscopy at 7T.

Del Bosque R, Cui J, Ogier S, Cheshkov S, Dimitrov I, Malloy C Magn Reson Med. 2020; 85(1):551-559.

PMID: 32820540 PMC: 7869840. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28425.


Correcting time-intensity curves in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI for inhomogeneous excitation fields at 7T.

van Rijssel M, Pluim J, Chan H, van den Wildenberg L, Schmitz A, Luijten P Magn Reson Med. 2019; 84(2):1000-1010.

PMID: 31880346 PMC: 7217168. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28147.


Estimating B in the breast at 7 T using a generic template.

van Rijssel M, Pluim J, Luijten P, Gilhuijs K, Raaijmakers A, Klomp D NMR Biomed. 2018; 31(5):e3911.

PMID: 29570887 PMC: 5947628. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3911.


The potential of multiparametric MRI of the breast.

Pinker K, Helbich T, Morris E Br J Radiol. 2016; 90(1069):20160715.

PMID: 27805423 PMC: 5605035. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160715.


References
1.
Kuhl C, Jost P, Morakkabati N, Zivanovic O, Schild H, Gieseke J . Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience. Radiology. 2006; 239(3):666-76. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2392050509. View

2.
Haddadin I, McIntosh A, Meisamy S, Corum C, Styczynski Snyder A, Powell N . Metabolite quantification and high-field MRS in breast cancer. NMR Biomed. 2007; 22(1):65-76. PMC: 2628417. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1217. View

3.
Gilhuijs K, Deurloo E, Muller S, Peterse J, Schultze Kool L . Breast MR imaging in women at increased lifetime risk of breast cancer: clinical system for computerized assessment of breast lesions initial results. Radiology. 2002; 225(3):907-16. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2253011582. View

4.
Kuhl C, Kooijman H, Gieseke J, Schild H . Effect of B1 inhomogeneity on breast MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology. 2007; 244(3):929-30. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2443070266. View

5.
Jemal A, Bray F, Center M, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D . Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011; 61(2):69-90. DOI: 10.3322/caac.20107. View