» Articles » PMID: 23977358

Prodromal Functioning of Migraine Patients Relative to Their Interictal State--an Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Aug 27
PMID 23977358
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Smartphones were used in an online Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) design to test prodromal functioning relative to the interictal state in migraine patients. Eighty-seven participants completed an electronic diary 4 times daily during 3-6 weeks to monitor their migraine attacks. Twice daily the diary additionally included 16 multi-answer questions covering physical symptoms (30 items), cognitive-affective functioning (25 items) and external factors (25 items). Eight clustered prodromal features were identified in the current study: sensory sensitivity, pain/stiffness, fatigue, cognitive functioning, positive affect, negative affect, effort spent and stressors encountered. Per feature, individual change scores with interictal control days--excluding 24-hour post-attack recovery--were computed for six 12-hour pre-attack time windows covering three prodromal days. Linear mixed model (fixed-effect) analysis established significant increases in sensory sensitivity, pain/stiffness and fatigue, and a tendency for increased negative affect, in the 12 hours prior to the attack. Positive affect and cognitive functioning were impaired both in the 25-36 hour and--more strongly--in the 12-hour time window before the attack. No effects were found for effort spent and stressors encountered. Exploratory (random effect) analysis revealed significant individual differences in the change scores in sensory sensitivity, pain/stiffness, fatigue and negative affect. It is concluded that the prodromal change in migraine--relative to interictal functioning--predominantly exists within the last 12 hours before attack onset. Individual diversity is large, however. Future research should zoom in to identify prodrome development within the 12 pre-attack hours as well as to isolate individual patterns.

Citing Articles

Effect of Ubrogepant on Patient-Reported Outcomes When Administered During the Migraine Prodrome: Results From the Randomized PRODROME Trial.

Lipton R, Harriott A, Ma J, Smith J, Stokes J, Gandhi P Neurology. 2024; 103(6):e209745.

PMID: 39197113 PMC: 11379431. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209745.


Association Between Electronic Diary-Rated Sleep, Mood, Energy, and Stress With Incident Headache in a Community-Based Sample.

Lateef T, Dey D, Leroux A, Cui L, Xiao M, Zipunnikov V Neurology. 2024; 102(4):e208102.

PMID: 38266217 PMC: 11383878. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208102.


Use of the experience sampling method in adolescents with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a feasibility study.

Lionarons J, Delespaul P, Hellebrekers D, Broen M, Klinkenberg S, Faber C Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023; 33(7):2281-2290.

PMID: 37914846 PMC: 11255059. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-023-02317-2.


Migraine Treatment Using Erenumab: Can Lead to a Cognitive and Psychological Qualitative Improvement?.

Torrisi M, Corallo F, Lo Buono V, Di Cara M, Grugno R, Lo Presti R Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(5).

PMID: 37241168 PMC: 10222452. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59050936.


Galcanezumab effects on incidence of headache after occurrence of triggers, premonitory symptoms, and aura in responders, non-responders, super-responders, and super non-responders.

Ashina S, Melo-Carrillo A, Toluwanimi A, Bolo N, Szabo E, Borsook D J Headache Pain. 2023; 24(1):26.

PMID: 36927366 PMC: 10018924. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01560-x.


References
1.
Sorbi M, Mak S, Houtveen J, Kleiboer A, van Doornen L . Mobile Web-based monitoring and coaching: feasibility in chronic migraine. J Med Internet Res. 2008; 9(5):e38. PMC: 2270417. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9.5.e38. View

2.
Neut D, Fily A, Cuvellier J, Vallee L . The prevalence of triggers in paediatric migraine: a questionnaire study in 102 children and adolescents. J Headache Pain. 2011; 13(1):61-5. PMC: 3253155. DOI: 10.1007/s10194-011-0397-2. View

3.
Schoonman G, Evers D, Terwindt G, van Dijk J, Ferrari M . The prevalence of premonitory symptoms in migraine: a questionnaire study in 461 patients. Cephalalgia. 2006; 26(10):1209-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01195.x. View

4.
Schoonman G, Evers D, Ballieux B, de Geus E, de Kloet E, Terwindt G . Is stress a trigger factor for migraine?. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007; 32(5):532-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.03.006. View

5.
Sorbi M, van der Vaart R . User acceptance of an Internet training aid for migraine self-management. J Telemed Telecare. 2010; 16(1):20-4. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2009.001007. View