Use of a Web 2.0 Portal to Improve Education and Communication in Young Patients with Families: Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal J Med Internet Res

Publisher JMIR Publications

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2013 Aug 27

PMID 23973555

Citations 28

Authors

Lena Hanberger

Johnny Ludvigsson

Sam Nordfeldt

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Diabetes requires extensive self-care and comprehensive knowledge, making patient education central to diabetes self-management. Web 2.0 systems have great potential to enhance health information and open new ways for patients and practitioners to communicate.

Objective: To develop a Web portal designed to facilitate self-management, including diabetes-related information and social networking functions, and to study its use and effects in pediatric patients with diabetes.

Methods: A Web 2.0 portal was developed in collaboration with patients, parents, and practitioners. It offered communication with local practitioners, interaction with peers, and access to relevant information and services. Children and adolescents with diabetes in a geographic population of two pediatric clinics in Sweden were randomized to a group receiving passwords for access to the portal or a control group with no access (n=230) for 1 year. All subjects had access during a second study year. Users' activity was logged by site and page visits. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL), empowerment (DES), and quality of information (QPP) questionnaires were given at baseline and after 1 and 2 study years. Clinical data came from the Swedish pediatric diabetes quality registry SWEDIABKIDS.

Results: There was a continuous flow of site visits, decreasing in summer and Christmas periods. In 119/233 families (51%), someone visited the portal the first study year and 169/484 (35%) the second study year. The outcome variables did not differ between intervention and control group. No adverse treatment or self-care effects were identified. A higher proportion of mothers compared to fathers visited once or more the first year (P<.001) and the second year (P<.001). The patients who had someone in the family visiting the portal 5 times or more, had shorter diabetes duration (P=.006), were younger (P=.008), had lower HbA1c after 1 year of access (P=.010), and were more often girls (P<.001). Peer interaction seems to be a valued aspect.

Conclusions: The Web 2.0 portal may be useful as a complement to traditional care for this target group. Widespread use of a portal would need integration in routine care and promotion by diabetes team members.

Trial Registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN):92107365; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN92107365/ (Archived by WebCite at http://webcitation.org/6IkiIvtSb).

Citing Articles

Educational technologies for families and children with type 1 diabetes: a scoping review.

Morgado P, Silva L, Aguiar R, Moraes J, Luquez T, Brandao E Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2025; 58:e20240134.

PMID: 39899746 PMC: 11774519. DOI: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0134en.

Online diabetes self-management education application for reducing glycated hemoglobin level among patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Usefi S, Davoodi F, Alizadeh A, Mohebi Far M Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024; 10(1):48.

PMID: 39681921 PMC: 11650839. DOI: 10.1186/s40842-024-00201-9.

Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Attaining HbA1c Targets in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Atia J, Al-Obaidi A, Al Sakini A, Al-Saady Y, Othman A, Hashim H Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2024; 17:11795514241293346.

PMID: 39450402 PMC: 11500216. DOI: 10.1177/11795514241293346.

ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes education in children and adolescents.

Lindholm Olinder A, DeAbreu M, Greene S, Haugstvedt A, Lange K, Majaliwa E Pediatr Diabetes. 2022; 23(8):1229-1242.

PMID: 36120721 PMC: 10107631. DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13418.

Efficacy of digital health interventions in youth with chronic medical conditions: A meta-analysis.

Domhardt M, Schroder A, Geirhos A, Steubl L, Baumeister H Internet Interv. 2021; 24:100373.

PMID: 33732626 PMC: 7941178. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100373.

References

Jackson C, Bolen S, Brancati F, Batts-Turner M, Gary T . A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care. Interactive information technology in diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21(2):105-10. PMC: 1484664. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00310.x. View

Bellazzi R, Larizza C, Montani S, Riva A, Stefanelli M, dAnnunzio G . A telemedicine support for diabetes management: the T-IDDM project. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2002; 69(2):147-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2607(02)00038-x. View

Nordqvist C, Hanberger L, Timpka T, Nordfeldt S . Health professionals' attitudes towards using a Web 2.0 portal for child and adolescent diabetes care: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2009; 11(2):e12. PMC: 2762803. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1152. View

Schachinger H, Hegar K, Hermanns N, Straumann M, Keller U, Fehm-Wolfsdorf G . Randomized controlled clinical trial of Blood Glucose Awareness Training (BGAT III) in Switzerland and Germany. J Behav Med. 2005; 28(6):587-94. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-005-9026-3. View

Baars R, Atherton C, Koopman H, Bullinger M, Power M . The European DISABKIDS project: development of seven condition-specific modules to measure health related quality of life in children and adolescents. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005; 3:70. PMC: 1326227. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-70. View

Cooper H, Cooper J, Milton B . Technology-based approaches to patient education for young people living with diabetes: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009; 10(7):474-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00509.x. View

Danne T, Mortensen H, Hougaard P, Lynggaard H, Aanstoot H, Chiarelli F . Persistent differences among centers over 3 years in glycemic control and hypoglycemia in a study of 3,805 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the Hvidøre Study Group. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(8):1342-7. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.8.1342. View

Nathan D, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(14):977-86. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401. View

Plank J, Kohler G, Rakovac I, Semlitsch B, Horvath K, Bock G . Long-term evaluation of a structured outpatient education programme for intensified insulin therapy in patients with Type 1 diabetes: a 12-year follow-up. Diabetologia. 2004; 47(8):1370-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-004-1456-x. View

10.

Murphy H, Rayman G, Skinner T . Psycho-educational interventions for children and young people with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006; 23(9):935-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01816.x. View

11.

Leksell J, Funnell M, Sandberg G, Smide B, Wiklund G, Wikblad K . Psychometric properties of the Swedish Diabetes Empowerment Scale. Scand J Caring Sci. 2007; 21(2):247-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00463.x. View

12.

Bott U, Bott S, Hemmann D, Berger M . Evaluation of a holistic treatment and teaching programme for patients with Type 1 diabetes who failed to achieve their therapeutic goals under intensified insulin therapy. Diabet Med. 2000; 17(9):635-43. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00345.x. View

13.

Hanberger L, Ludvigsson J, Nordfeldt S . Quality of care from the patient's perspective in pediatric diabetes care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005; 72(2):197-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.10.009. View

14.

Funnell M, Anderson R . Patient empowerment: a look back, a look ahead. Diabetes Educ. 2003; 29(3):454-8, 460, 462 passim. DOI: 10.1177/014572170302900310. View

15.

Ekberg J, Ericson L, Timpka T, Eriksson H, Nordfeldt S, Hanberger L . Web 2.0 systems supporting childhood chronic disease management: design guidelines based on information behaviour and social learning theories. J Med Syst. 2010; 34(2):107-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-008-9222-0. View

16.

Viklund G, Ortqvist E, Wikblad K . Assessment of an empowerment education programme. A randomized study in teenagers with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2007; 24(5):550-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02114.x. View

17.

Bartlett Y, Coulson N . An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects health professional/patient communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 83(1):113-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.029. View

18.

Hoey H, Aanstoot H, Chiarelli F, Daneman D, Danne T, Dorchy H . Good metabolic control is associated with better quality of life in 2,101 adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(11):1923-8. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.11.1923. View

19.

Samann A, Muhlhauser I, Bender R, Hunger-Dathe W, Kloos C, Muller U . Flexible intensive insulin therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes and high risk for severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29(10):2196-9. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-0751. View

20.

Flicker S, Goldberg E, Read S, Veinot T, McClelland A, Saulnier P . HIV-positive youth's perspectives on the Internet and e-health. J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(3):e32. PMC: 1550612. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e32. View