» Articles » PMID: 23968674

Coalition Priorité Cancer and the Pharmaceutical Industry in Quebec: Conflicts of Interest in the Reimbursement of Expensive Cancer Drugs?

Overview
Journal Healthc Policy
Specialty Public Health
Date 2013 Aug 24
PMID 23968674
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the context of scarce public resources, patient interest groups have increasingly turned to private organizations for financing, including the pharmaceutical industry. This practice puts advocacy groups in a situation of potential conflicts between the interests of patients and those of the drug companies. The interests of patients and industry can converge on issues related to the approval and reimbursement of medications. But even on this issue, interests do not always align perfectly. Using the Quebec example of Coalition Priorité Cancer (CPC) as a case study, we examine the ethical issues raised by such financial relationships in the context of drug reimbursement decision-making. We collected, compiled and analyzed publicly available information on the CPC's organization and activities; this approach allowed us to raise and discuss important questions regarding the possible influence exerted on patient groups by donors. We conclude with some recommendations.

Citing Articles

A hidden web of policy influence: The pharmaceutical industry's engagement with UK's All-Party Parliamentary Groups.

Rickard E, Ozieranski P PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0252551.

PMID: 34166396 PMC: 8224875. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252551.


Five years of pharmaceutical industry funding of patient organisations in Sweden: Cross-sectional study of companies, patient organisations and drugs.

Mulinari S, Vilhelmsson A, Rickard E, Ozieranski P PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0235021.

PMID: 32579571 PMC: 7313941. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235021.


Financial relationships between patient and consumer representatives and the health industry: A systematic review.

Khabsa J, Semaan A, El-Harakeh A, Khamis A, Obeid S, Noureldine H Health Expect. 2019; 23(2):483-495.

PMID: 31858662 PMC: 7104632. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13013.


Exposing drug industry funding of UK patient organisations.

Ozieranski P, Rickard E, Mulinari S BMJ. 2019; 365:l1806.

PMID: 31122928 PMC: 6529850. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l1806.


Association between commercial funding of Canadian patient groups and their views about funding of medicines: An observational study.

Lexchin J PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0212399.

PMID: 30768629 PMC: 6377138. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212399.


References
1.
Ferner R, McDowell S . How NICE may be outflanked. BMJ. 2006; 332(7552):1268-71. PMC: 1471969. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1268. View

2.
Hemminki E, Toiviainen H, Vuorenkoski L . Co-operation between patient organisations and the drug industry in Finland. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70(8):1171-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.005. View

3.
Mintzes B . Should patient groups accept money from drug companies? No. BMJ. 2007; 334(7600):935. PMC: 1865416. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39185.394005.AD. View

4.
Lofgren H . Pharmaceuticals and the consumer movement: the ambivalences of 'patient power'. Aust Health Rev. 2004; 28(2):228-37. DOI: 10.1071/ah040228. View

5.
Allsop J, Jones K, Baggott R . Health consumer groups in the UK: a new social movement?. Sociol Health Illn. 2004; 26(6):737-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00416.x. View