» Articles » PMID: 23965280

Social Support During Delivery in Rural Central Ghana: a Mixed Methods Study of Women's Preferences for and Against Inclusion of a Lay Companion in the Delivery Room

Overview
Journal J Biosoc Sci
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2013 Aug 23
PMID 23965280
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to explore pregnant women's attitudes towards the inclusion of a lay companion as a source of social support during labour and delivery in rural central Ghana. Quantitative demographic and pregnancy-related data were collected from 50 pregnant women presenting for antenatal care at a rural district hospital and analysed using STATA/IC 11.1. Qualitative attitudinal questions were collected from the same women through semi-structured interviews; data were analysed using NVivo 9.0. Twenty-nine out of 50 women (58%) preferred to have a lay companion during facility-based labour and delivery, whereas 21 (42%) preferred to deliver alone with the nurses in a facility. Women desiring a companion were younger, had more antenatal care visits, had greater educational attainment and were likely to be experiencing their first delivery. Women varied in the type of companion they prefer (male partner vs female relative). What was expected in terms of social support differed based upon the type of companion. Male companions were expected to provide emotional support and to 'witness her pain'. Female companions were expected to provide emotional support as well as instrumental, informational and appraisal support. Three qualitative themes were identified that run counter to the inclusion of a lay helper: fear of an evil-spirited companion, a companion not being necessary or helpful, and being 'too shy' of a companion. This research challenges the assumption of a unilateral desire for social support during labour and delivery, and suggests that women differ in the type of companion and type of support they prefer during facility deliveries. Future research is needed to determine the direction of the relationship--whether women desire certain types of support and thus choose companions they believe can meet those needs, or whether women desire a certain companion and adjust their expectations accordingly.

Citing Articles

Desire for labor companionship and its associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care at public health facilities in Debre Berhan City: a cross-sectional study.

Silesh M, Demisse T, Abebe K, Taye B, Moltot T, Chekole M Front Glob Womens Health. 2025; 5():1426502.

PMID: 39850364 PMC: 11756528. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1426502.


Utilization of birth companionship and its associated factors among laboring mothers during facilities birth in sub-Saharan Africa. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gudeta M, Assefa N, Bacha Y, Gebremedhin Tekle M, Hussen F, Alemayehu A SAGE Open Med. 2024; 12:20503121241272572.

PMID: 39372911 PMC: 11450795. DOI: 10.1177/20503121241272572.


Women's attitudes, prevalence, related factors, and perceived barriers of birth companionship in Saudi Arabia.

Mousa O, Salameh B, Alqahtani M, David M, Almefarfesh A, Duhilan D Womens Health (Lond). 2024; 20:17455057231224553.

PMID: 38279816 PMC: 10822074. DOI: 10.1177/17455057231224553.


Introducing Birth Companion in Labour: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Khan T, Ahmad A, Fatima B, Furqan S, Mushtaq E, Nawab T J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023; 73(Suppl 1):1-10.

PMID: 37916015 PMC: 10616060. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-023-01780-w.


Access to support during childbirth?: women's preferences and experiences of support person integration in a cross-sectional facility-based survey.

Nakphong M, Afulani P, Opot J, Sudhinaraset M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):665.

PMID: 37716939 PMC: 10504704. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05962-2.