» Articles » PMID: 23963741

EFSA's Scientific Activities and Achievements on the Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) During Its First Decade of Existence: Looking Back and Ahead

Overview
Journal Transgenic Res
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2013 Aug 22
PMID 23963741
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and derived food and feed products are subject to a risk analysis and regulatory approval before they can enter the market in the European Union (EU). In this risk analysis process, the role of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which was created in 2002 in response to multiple food crises, is to independently assess and provide scientific advice to risk managers on any possible risks that the use of GMOs may pose to human and animal health and the environment. EFSA's scientific advice is elaborated by its GMO Panel with the scientific support of several working groups and EFSA's GMO Unit. This review presents EFSA's scientific activities and highlights its achievements on the risk assessment of GMOs for the first 10 years of its existence. Since 2002, EFSA has issued 69 scientific opinions on genetically modified (GM) plant market registration applications, of which 62 for import and processing for food and feed uses, six for cultivation and one for the use of pollen (as or in food), and 19 scientific opinions on applications for marketing products made with GM microorganisms. Several guidelines for the risk assessment of GM plants, GM microorganisms and GM animals, as well as on specific issues such as post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) were elaborated. EFSA also provided scientific advice upon request of the European Commission on safeguard clause and emergency measures invoked by EU Member States, annual PMEM reports, the potential risks of new biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques, evaluations of previously assessed GMOs in the light of new scientific publications, and the use of antibiotic resistance marker genes in GM plants. Future challenges relevant to the risk assessment of GMOs are discussed. EFSA's risk assessments of GMO applications ensure that data are analysed and presented in a way that facilitates scientifically sound decisions that protect human and animal health and the environment.

Citing Articles

Guidance to develop specific protection goals options for environmental risk assessment at EFSA, in relation to biodiversity and ecosystem services.

EFSA J. 2025; 14(6):e04499.

PMID: 40007821 PMC: 11847983. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4499.


Histone acetyltransferase Sas3 in Phomopsis liquidambaris promotes spermidine biosynthesis against Fusarium graminearum in wheat.

Cui X, Yang Z, Wang L, Dong Y, Ke S, Zhan Z Theor Appl Genet. 2025; 138(2):48.

PMID: 39921737 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-025-04833-y.


Leveraging RNA interference technology for selective and sustainable crop protection.

Qi H, Zhang D, Liu B, Chen J, Han D, Wang D Front Plant Sci. 2025; 15():1502015.

PMID: 39777080 PMC: 11703868. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1502015.


Does the growing of Bt maize change abundance or ecological function of non-target animals compared to the growing of non-GM maize? A systematic review.

Meissle M, Naranjo S, Romeis J Environ Evid. 2024; 11(1):21.

PMID: 39294679 PMC: 11378853. DOI: 10.1186/s13750-022-00272-0.


Advancements in genetic studies of mushrooms: a comprehensive review.

Tarafder E, Nizamani M, Karunarathna S, Das D, Zeng X, Rind R World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024; 40(9):275.

PMID: 39034336 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-024-04079-8.


References
1.
Heinemann J, Agapito-Tenfen S, Carman J . A comparative evaluation of the regulation of GM crops or products containing dsRNA and suggested improvements to risk assessments. Environ Int. 2013; 55:43-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.02.010. View

2.
Qin S, Lin H, Jiang P . Advances in genetic engineering of marine algae. Biotechnol Adv. 2012; 30(6):1602-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.05.004. View

3.
Baum J, Bogaert T, Clinton W, Heck G, Feldmann P, Ilagan O . Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25(11):1322-6. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1359. View

4.
Raybould A . Can science justify regulatory decisions about the cultivation of transgenic crops?. Transgenic Res. 2012; 21(4):691-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11248-012-9613-3. View

5.
Georgianna D, Mayfield S . Exploiting diversity and synthetic biology for the production of algal biofuels. Nature. 2012; 488(7411):329-35. DOI: 10.1038/nature11479. View