» Articles » PMID: 23963503

Clinical and Oncological Effects of Triplet Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer Associated with Unfavorable Prognostic Factors

Overview
Journal Surg Today
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2013 Aug 22
PMID 23963503
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purposes: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that the survival of patients undergoing R0 resection after triplet chemotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer with unfavorable prognostic factors (Category 3) would be similar to that of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer without such factors (Category 1).

Methods: Patients with Category 3 tumors were assigned to receive triplet chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and nedaplatin (FAN) followed by radical esophagectomy. The outcomes of the bimodality treatment for Category 3 patients (n = 25) were compared with those of Category 1 patients (n = 41) in a prospective cohort study.

Results: Grade 3 or higher toxicity developed during chemotherapy in 32 % of the Category 3 patients, with no treatment-related deaths. No significant difference was detected in the surgery-related mortality and morbidity rates between the two groups. The recurrence-free survival was significantly worse in Category 3 than in Category 1 patients (p = 0.002), although the overall survival was not significantly different (p = 0.085) between the two groups in cases of R0 resection (5-year survival rates: 34.4 vs. 66.5 %).

Conclusions: Although FAN chemotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy can be safely performed, this treatment modality may not have sufficient power to cure Category 3 disease.

Citing Articles

Camrelizumab in combination with chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for the conversion of locally advanced unresectable oesophageal squamous carcinoma: protocol for a two-arm, open-label phase II trial.

Chen M, Huang Y, Zhang S, Zheng Y, Zeng T, Chen C BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e075421.

PMID: 38418234 PMC: 10910487. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075421.


Current status of and perspectives regarding neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Saeki H, Nakashima Y, Zaitsu Y, Tsuda Y, Kasagi Y, Ando K Surg Today. 2015; 46(3):261-7.

PMID: 25740123 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-015-1144-0.


Clinicopathological factors predicting R0 resection and long-term survival after esophagectomy in patients with T4 esophageal cancer undergoing induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Karimata H, Shimoji H, Nishimaki T Surg Today. 2014; 45(4):479-86.

PMID: 25059344 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0980-7.


Esophageal cancer: A Review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, staging workup and treatment modalities.

Napier K, Scheerer M, Misra S World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014; 6(5):112-20.

PMID: 24834141 PMC: 4021327. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i5.112.

References
1.
Nishimaki T, Tanaka O, Suzuki T, Aizawa K, Hatakeyama K, Muto T . Patterns of lymphatic spread in thoracic esophageal cancer. Cancer. 1994; 74(1):4-11. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940701)74:1<4::aid-cncr2820740103>3.0.co;2-r. View

2.
Rizk N, Ishwaran H, Rice T, Chen L, Schipper P, Kesler K . Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009; 251(1):46-50. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee. View

3.
Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Kurokawa Y, Takiguchi S, Nakajima K, Fujiwara Y . Clinical relevance of induction triplet chemotherapy for esophageal cancer invading adjacent organs. J Surg Oncol. 2012; 106(4):441-7. DOI: 10.1002/jso.23081. View

4.
Nishimaki T, Suzuki T, Tanaka Y, Aizawa K, Hatakeyama K, Muto T . Intramural metastases from thoracic esophageal cancer: local indicators of advanced disease. World J Surg. 1996; 20(1):32-7. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900006. View

5.
Kosugi S, Kanda T, Nakagawa S, Ohashi M, Nishimaki T, Hatakeyama K . Efficacy and toxicity of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cisplatin/nedaplatin treatment as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced esophageal carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005; 40(8):886-92. DOI: 10.1080/00365520510015601. View