» Articles » PMID: 23959960

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Lispro in Geriatric Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: a Retrospective Analysis of Seven Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2013 Aug 21
PMID 23959960
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Glycemic control in geriatric patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) remains clinically challenging. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of insulin lispro in patients C65 years (geriatric) to those\65 years (non-geriatric), using a metaanalysis of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT).

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of predefined endpoints from an integrated database of seven RCTs of T2DM patients treated with insulin lispro. The primary efficacy measure tested the non-inferiority of insulin lispro (geriatric vs. non-geriatric; non-inferiority margin 0.4 %) in terms of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change from baseline to Month 3 (N = 1,525), with change from baseline to Month 6 as a supportive analysis (N = 885). Changes in HbA1c from baseline were evaluated with an analysis of covariance model. Secondary measures included incidence and rate of hypoglycemia, and incidence of cardiovascular events.

Results: Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to Month 3 was similar for geriatric (-0.97 %) and non-geriatric patients (-1.05 %); least-square (LS) mean difference (95 % CI) was 0.02 % (-0.11, 0.15 %; p = 0.756). Similar results were observed in patients treated up to Month 6; LS mean difference (95 % CI) was 0.07 % (-0.12, 0.26 %; p = 0.490). Decrease in HbA1c from baseline to Months 3 and 6 was non-inferior in geriatric compared with non-geriatric patients. There were no significant differences in the incidence and the rate of hypoglycemia, incidence of cardiovascular events, or other serious adverse events including malignancy, post-baseline between the two cohorts.

Conclusion: Key measures of efficacy and safety in geriatric patients with T2DM were not significantly different from non-geriatric patients when utilizing insulin lispro. Insulin lispro may be considered a safe and efficacious therapeutic option for the management of T2DM in geriatric patients.

Citing Articles

HbA1c target achievement in the elderly: results of the Titration and Optimization trial for initiation of insulin glargine 100 U/mL in patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs.

Fritsche A, Anderten H, Pfohl M, Pscherer S, Borck A, Pegelow K BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019; 7(1):e000668.

PMID: 31423316 PMC: 6688703. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000668.

References
1.
Raz I, Wilson P, Strojek K, Kowalska I, Bozikov V, Gitt A . Effects of prandial versus fasting glycemia on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: the HEART2D trial. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(3):381-6. PMC: 2646013. DOI: 10.2337/dc08-1671. View

2.
Lee S, Boscardin W, Cenzer I, Huang E, Rice-Trumble K, Eng C . The risks and benefits of implementing glycemic control guidelines in frail older adults with diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011; 59(4):666-72. PMC: 3764989. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03362.x. View

3.
Neumiller J, Setter S . Pharmacologic management of the older patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010; 7(6):324-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.12.002. View

4.
Bourdel-Marchasson I, Schweizer A, Dejager S . Incretin therapies in the management of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hosp Pract (1995). 2011; 39(1):7-21. DOI: 10.3810/hp.2011.02.369. View

5.
Leinung M, Thompson S, Nardacci E . Benefits of continuous glucose monitor use in clinical practice. Endocr Pract. 2010; 16(3):371-5. DOI: 10.4158/EP09287.OR. View